Influence of Radio-Protective Operating Room on the Radiation Protection Efficiency and Handle Flexibility of Operators Performing Interventional Procedures

SUN Zhi-shan,ZENG Jian-ping,ZHOU Sheng-hua,LIU Yuan,LIU Ping,HUANG He,HUANG Hao-bo,KANG You-gen
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1008-794x.2013.08.019
2013-01-01
Abstract:Objective To observe the effect of additional use of anti-radiation operating room on the basis of employing traditional protection devices on the radiation protection efficiency and handle flexibility of operators working in interventional procedures.Methods The traditional anti-radiation system,including lead rubber apron,bib and hanging screen,and a new anti-radiation system were employed in 50 coronary intervention procedures.The radiation protection efficiency was evaluated by using a Geiger counter.The measuring distance for lead rubber apron and protection shield was 130 cm height from the floor,corresponding to the chest level of a 170-centimeter tall operator.At this level one point was set up on both the inner and outer surface of the protective devices.The radiation shielding effectiveness was calculated by using the following formula: shielding efficiency =(outer X-ray dose-inner X-ray dose) ÷ outer X-ray dose × 100%.And the influence of the protective devices on the surgery and handle flexibility was evaluated by the operator with scores.The results were analyzed.Results The shielding efficiency of the new anti-radiation system was 99.06% ± 0.74%,which was obviously better than that of traditional anti-radiation system(90.33% ± 1.41%),the difference was statistically significant(P 0.01).No significant difference in hampering to operation(0 vs 0,P 0.05) and handle flexibility during adjusting tube-direction(2.96 ± 0.20 vs 3.00 ± 0,P 0.05) existed between the two systems.Conclusion On the basis of using traditional protection system such as lead rubber apron,bib and hanging screen,additional use of anti-radiation operating room can increase the radiation shielding efficiency,and it will not interfere the operation and handle flexibility during adjusting tube-direction.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?