Abstract:Background: CONTEXT Intraoperative three-dimensional (3D) computed tomography (CT) imaging has become increasingly popular in spine surgery. Previous spine surgeon radiation exposure research has focused largely on procedures using fluoroscopy, however, few studies have been performed on the subject since the introduction of the 3D imaging systems. As a result, concerns have re-emerged over surgeon radiation exposure and the effectiveness of operating room (OR) protocols for decreasing workplace radiation. Current radiation safety guidelines require surgeons wear full body protective lead while any type of radiation is being administered during surgery. As a result, local institutions do not allow for the use of free-standing lead shields for sole radiation protection in the operating room. However, there is no data available to demonstrate whether the additional personal lead is required, or if in fact the lead shield alone is sufficient. Purpose: This study investigated the effectiveness of a free-standing lead shield in reducing spine surgeon radiation exposure in the operating room during intraoperative imaging. Study design/setting: A prospective clinical research study at a large, tertiary care center. Patient sample: Twenty-seven patients undergoing instrumented spinal procedures between June and August 2019. Outcome measures: Fluoroscopy time, total fluoroscopy dose delivered, 3D dose delivered, total 3D spins, number of HD spins, number of standard spins, number of fluoroscopic images, number of spine levels operated on, patient size setting, shield distance from patient, radiation dose in front of shield, radiation dose behind shield. Methods: Twenty-seven instrumented spinal procedures using the O-Arm Imaging System (Medtronic, Minneapolis, MN) were observed to determine radiation exposure to a spine surgeon standing behind a lead shield in the OR. Two thermoluminescent dosimeters were used to measure scatter radiation in front of and behind lead shields. Both fluoroscopy and intraoperative CT based radiation exposure was recorded. The dosimeter readings were compared to determine the degree of radiation attenuation by the lead shield. Regression analysis of the exposure values from behind the shield, shield distance from the patient, and radiation dose delivered by the imaging system was utilized to estimate the number of cases required to surpass annual exposure limits. Case numbers were calculated for the highest "worst case" and "average case" exposure values. The safe annual occupation exposure limit determined by the National Council on Radiation Protection is five roentgen equivalent man (rem) or 50,000 microsieverts (μSv). Results: Average surgeon radiation exposure per case was 0.694 μSv (SD: 0.501, Range: 0.105-2.167) behind the lead shield compared to 14.577 μSv (SD: 9.864, Range: 2.185-44.492) in front of the lead shield. The average radiation dose reduction by the lead shield was 13.962 μSv (SD: 9.49, Range: 2.08-42.72) per case, which is equivalent to an average of 95.65% (SD: 1.71) radiation attenuation by lead shielding. If surgeons stand behind lead shields in the OR, the annual number of 3D image-guided spinal procedures required to surpass exposure limits is 15,479 and 67,060 based on "worst case" and "average case" analyses, respectively. Conclusions: Our study demonstrates standing behind intraoperative lead shields is very effective at decreasing radiation exposure to surgeons. Additionally, surgeon radiation doses behind lead shielding fall far below annual exposure limits. Surgeons should not need additional protective equipment when a lead shield is used.

Radiation protection for an intra-operative X-ray device

Radiation Oncology-External-Beam Radiation Therapy

Radiation distribution in a hybrid operating room, utilizing different X-ray imaging systems: investigations to minimize occupational exposure

Radiation shielding calculation for interventional radiology: An updated workload survey using a dose monitoring software

Impact of X‐Ray Protective Drapes on Operator and Patient Radiation Exposure During Cardiac Catheterization

Intraoperative radiation therapy with 50 kV x‐rays: A multi‐institutional review

Radiation protection in fixed PET/CT facilities—design and operation

Potential Hazard Due to Induced Radioactivity Secondary to Radiotherapy: the Report of Task Group 136 of the American Association of Physicists in Medicine

Understanding the Basis of Radiation Protection for Endovascular Procedures: Occupational and Patients

Real-Time Patient and Staff Radiation Dose Monitoring in IR Practice

Personnel exposure during gamma endovascular brachytherapy

Radiation protection during hybrid procedures: innovation creates new challenges

Radiation exposure and associated risks to operating-room personnel during use of fluoroscopic guidance for selected orthopaedic surgical procedures.

Shielding Analysis of a Preclinical Bremsstrahlung X-ray FLASH Radiotherapy System within a Clinical Radiation Therapy Vault

The effectiveness of a free-standing lead-shield in reducing spine surgeon radiation exposure during intraoperative 3-dimensional imaging

Operator Radiation and the Efficacy of Ceiling-Suspended Lead Screen Shielding during Coronary Angiography: An Anthropomorphic Phantom Study Using Real-Time Dosimeters

Comprehensive Shielding System Enhances Radiation Protection for Structural Heart Procedures

Assessment of scattered and leakage radiation from ultra-portable digital chest X-ray systems: An independent study

Protection Design on Occupational Hazards in the Radiotherapy Place Reconstruction and Device Renewal

Radiation shielding calculation for digital breast tomosynthesis rooms with an updated workload survey

Experimental Research of Dose Distribution and Protection for Mobile Intra-Operative Radiotherapy Accelerator in Operating Room