Fischer–Tropsch Synthesis: Support and Cobalt Cluster Size Effects on Kinetics over Co/Al2O3 and Co/SiO2 Catalysts
Wenping Ma,Gary Jacobs,Dennis E. Sparks,Muthu K. Gnanamani,Venkat Ramana Rao Pendyala,Chia H. Yen,Jennifer L. S. Klettlinger,Thomas M. Tomsik,Burtron H. Davis
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2010.10.029
IF: 7.4
2010-01-01
Fuel
Abstract:The influence of support type and cobalt cluster size (i.e., with average diameters falling within the range of 8–40nm) on the kinetics of Fischer–Tropsch synthesis (FT) were investigated by kinetic tests employing a CSTR and two Co/γ-Al2O3 catalysts having different average pore sizes, and two Co/SiO2 catalysts prepared on the same support but having different loadings. A kinetic model -rCO=kPCOaPH2b/(1+mPH2O/PH2) that contains a water effect constant “m” was used to fit the experimental data obtained with all four catalysts. Kinetic parameters suggest that both support type and average Co particle size impact FT behavior. Cobalt cluster size influenced kinetic parameters such as reaction order, rate constant, and the water effect parameter. In the cluster size range studied, decreasing the average Co cluster diameter by about 30% led to an increase in the intrinsic reaction rate constant k, defined on a per g of catalyst basis, by 62–102% for the γ-Al2O3 and SiO2-supported cobalt catalysts. This increase was due to the higher active Co0 surface site density as measured by hydrogen chemisorption. Moreover, less inhibition by adsorbed CO and greater H2 dissociation on catalysts having smaller Co particles was suggested by the higher a and lower b values obtained for the measured reaction orders. Interestingly, irrespective of support type, the catalysts having smaller average Co particles were more sensitive to water. Comparing the catalysts having strong interactions between cobalt and support (Co/Al2O3) to the ones with weak interactions (Co/SiO2), the water effect parameters were found to be positive (indicating a negative influence on CO conversion) and negative (denoting a positive effect on CO conversion), respectively. No clear trend was observed for b values among the different supports, but greater a and a/b values were observed for both Al2O3-supported Co catalysts, implying greater inhibition of the FT rate by strongly adsorbed CO on Co/Al2O3 relative to Co/SiO2. For both supports, the order on PCO was always found to be negative (i.e., suggesting an inhibiting effect) and positive for PH2 for all four catalysts. The order of the reaction on PH2 was close to 0.5, suggesting that dissociated H2 is likely involved in the catalytic cycle. Finally, in the limited range of average pore diameters studied (13.5 and 18.2nm), the average pore size of the Al2O3-supported Co catalysts displayed no observable impact on the reaction rate or water effect, suggesting either that the reaction is kinetically controlled, or that the pore size difference was not significant enough to elicit a measurable response.