Clinical Analysis of Elderly Acute Myocardial Infarction and Cardiogenic Shock after Coronary Intervention Treatment

YANG Chen,SUN Lei,WU Gui-jun,ZHAO Xin,HAN Ya-ling,JING Quan-min
DOI: https://doi.org/10.13241/j.cnki.pmb.2012.11.025
2012-01-01
Abstract:Objective: Comparative Analysis of interventional therapy and conservative treatment in elderly with cardiogenic shock complicating acute myocardial infarction.Methods: Retrospective analysis of elderly with cardiogenic shock complicating acute myocardial infarction was conducted in our hospital and 230 patients were enrolled.Patients were arranged to percutaneous coronary intervention group(PCI,120 patients) and conservative treatment group(CT,110 patients) according to the medical assessment of doctors.Then risk factors and efficacy of different treatment were analyzed.Results: History of myocardial infarction and history of heart failure were higher in conservative treatments group(24 % vs 20 % P0.05;25 % vs 17.3 %,P0.05),PCI decreased fatality in elderly with cardiogenic shock complicating acute myocardial infarction(40.8 % vs 71.8 %,P0.05).Meanwhile,conservative treatment group had more arrhythmia,lung infection and renal failure(26.7 % vs 21.8 %,P0.05;11.8 % vs 5.8 % P0.05;8.2 % vs 2.0 %,P0.05).Conclusion: Although has more complications compared to conservative treatment,PCI may significantly improved the prognosis in elderly with cardiogenic shock complicating acute myocardial infarction.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?