Validity and reliability of Chinese version of Clinic Alcohol Withdrawal Syndrome Scale

ZHUO Chuan-Jun,HUANG Yue-Qin,LI Ji-tao,LIU Xue-hua,LI Bing
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1000-6729.2010.05.008
2010-01-01
Abstract:Objective:To evaluate the validity and reliability of the Chinese version of the revised Clinic Institute Alcohol Withdrawal Scale(CIWA-Ar).Methods:Totally 175 patients diagnosed as alcohol dependence according to the criteria of ICD-10 were involved.Iintraclass correlation coefficient(ICC)analysis was applied for examining interrater consistency and Cronbach' s α for internal consistency.Confirmatory factor analysis was used to examine the construct validity. Correlation analysis between CIWA-Ar and Clinical Global Impression(CGI)were conducted to evaluate the criterion validity. Based on clinical criteria,the sensitivity and specificity and ROC curve was calculated so as to establish the cut-off point of the scale.Results:(1)Reliability.ICC value was 0.73,and Cronbach' s α was 0.85,which indicated good interrater and internal consistency.(2)Validity.Confirmatory factor analysis revealed that each item of the scale had relatively high load on the primary factor(0.523~0.964),suggesting that the scale had a good construct validity.At the time of admission,the total score of the CIWA-Ar was positively correlated with that of CGI(r=0.77,P<0.05). As treatment went on,total score of the CIWA-Ar showed a downward trend,at the end of the first week,the total score of the CIWA-Ar was positively correlated with that of CGI(r=0.82,P<0.05),which reflected the changes following the treatment.(3)The cut-off point of CIWA-Ar for mild alcohol withdrawal state was determined as ≥7.With this cut-off point,CIWA-Ar had both high sensitivity(85.7%)and high specificity(83.8%),and the area under curve(AUC)was 0.93,with the positive predictive value(PPV)of 64.5% and the negative predictive value(NPV)of 91.1%.The cut-off point of CIWA-Ar for moderate withdrawal state was determined as ≥11,and the sensitivity and specificity of CIWA-Ar were 96.9 % and 99.6 % respectively,with the AUC of 0.98,the PPV of 97.9%,and the NPV of 98.4%. The cut-off point of CIWA-Ar for severe withdrawal state was determined as ≥16. With this cut-off point,CIWA-Ar had both high sensitivity(100 %)and high specificity(94.9 %),with the AUC of 0.99,the PPV of 85.1%,and the NPV of 100%.Conclusion:CIWA-Ar has good reliability and validity and can reflect the change of the disease and the efficacy of treatment.Therefore it may be used as a clinical instrument to evaluate the severity of alcohol withdrawal state.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?