Interests versus Culture in the Theory of Institutional Change?
Ian Adams,Philippe Aghion,Patrick Bolton,Varouj A Aivazian,Ying Ge,Jiaping Qiu,Martin Albrow,Armen A Alchian,Harold Demsetz,Gordon W Allport,Gabriel A Almond,GA Almond,JS Coleman,Gabriel A Almond,G Bingham Powell Jr,Gabriel A Almond,G Bingham Powell Jr,Robert J Mundt,Lee J Alston,LJ Alston,T Eggertsson,DC North,Yener Altunbas,Lynne Evans,Philip Molyneux,Carlos Alves,Victor Mendes,Alice H Amsden,Matt Andrews,Masahiko Aoki,David E Apter,Thomas Aquinas,RW Dyson,Hannah Arendt,Aristotle,E Barker,RF Stalley,W Brian Arthur,PW Anderson,KJ Arrow,D Pines,TG Arun,JD Turner,Robert Ash,J Megan Greene,R Ash,JM Greene,Shusong Ba,Guoliang Lü,Seung-Wook Baek,Walter Bagehot,P Smith,Chong-En Bai,Qiao Liu,Joe Lu,Frank M Song,Junxi Zhang,Zheng Bai,Stephen M Bainbridge,Per Bak,Chao Tang,Kurt Wiesenfeld,Michael Bakunin,MS Shatz,Bernadette Barber,Zevedei Barbu,William J Baumol,Robert E Litan,Carl J Schramm,Lucian Arye Bebchuk,Mark J Roe,Jeremy Bentham,JH Burns,HLA Hart,R Harrison,Jeremy Bentham,Allen N Berger,Iftekhar Hasan,Mingming Zhou,Daniel Berkowitz,Katharina Pistor,Jean-Francois Richard,Adolf A Berle,Gardiner C Means,Eduard Bernstein,H Tudor,Sanjai Bhagat,Bernard Black,Mayling Birney,CE Black,Margaret M Blair,Jean Bodin,JH Franklin,Alfred Bonné,Stephen Bottomley,Michael Bradley,Cindy A Schipani,Anant K Sundaram,James P Walsh,Nick Bradley,Dan Braha,Michael Bratton,JS Midgal,A Kohli,V Shue,William W Bratton Jr,Joseph A McCahery,Kjeld Erik Brødsgaard,KE Brødsgaard,D Strand,Kjeld Erik Brødsgaard,David Strand,KE Brødsgaard,D Strand,Kjeld Erik Brødsgaard,Susan Young,KE Brødsgaard,S Young,Kjeld Erik Brødsgaard,Yongnian Zheng,KE Brødsgaard,Y Zheng,Ian Brown,Adam Steen,Julie Foreman,Zbigniew Brzezinski,James M Buchanan,Trevor Buck,Igor Filatotchev,Peter Nolan,Mike Wright,Alan Buckingham,Peter Saunders,Pawan S Budhwar,Yaw A Debrah,PS Budhwar,YA Debrah,Edmund Burke,LG Mitchell,John P Burns,KE Brødsgaard,Y Zheng,Orville Vernon Burton,Katia Caldari,Alan Calder,Fengqi Cao,Chunxin Jia,Lan Cao
2017-01-01
Abstract:The conceptual framework of political effectiveness, political stability and political adaptability has revealed the nature of corporate governance in multiple dimensions within a broader and evolving institutional context. Compared with organisational embedment, the Chinese Communist Partys ideological penetration has a more far-reaching effect on corporate governance. The concept of political adaptability demonstrates the role of corporate governance as developmental integrator in the context of the party-state–society synergy. The Chinese model of corporate governance involves elite-guided forced saving through which economic growth can be technically spurred by a technocratic system in an instrumental manner. To improve the effectiveness of corporate governance, policy design should therefore focus on keeping a dynamic balance between exercising state ownership rights to reduce agency costs and …