Abstract:Against increasing rule of law backsliding within the EU, the European Commission has presented the rule of law as a well-established and well-defined principle whose core meaning is furthermore shared as a common value among all Member States. In refute, the national governments of the two EU countries, which are both subject to special EU procedures on account of the systemic threat to the rule of law their repeated actions have caused, have claimed that the rule of law is neither defined in EU law, nor could it be defined in EU law. This article's primary aim is to assess these conflicting assertions. It does so by first offering an overview of the EU legal framework on the basis of which it is shown that the rule of law, as asserted by the Commission, is a well-established constitutional principle of EU law. It furthermore shows that it is well-defined, not least because of the Court of Justice's extensive case law, the European Commission's definitional codification of it and most recently, the adoption of the Rule of Law Conditionality Regulation 2020/2092 which provides the first comprehensive allen compassing internal-oriented definition of the rule of law adopted by the EU co-legislators. This article furthermore contends that the EU's understanding of the rule of law reflects what may be presented as a broad consensus in the European legal space on its core meaning and components; its legal use as a primary principle of judicial interpretation and a source from which standards of judicial review may be derived; and how the rule of law relates to other fundamental values. Finally, this article concludes by examining the reality of a potentially emerging East-West dissensus as regards the rule of law. In light of evidence of strong and widespread support for the rule of law in every single EU Member State in the face of top-down attempts to systemically undermine it, it is however submitted that there is no meaningful East-West divide but an authoritarian-liberal divide at elite level.

The Rule of State Law and the Rule-of-Law State: Economic Analysis of the Legal Founations of Development

Assessment of the Rule of Law and Its Application in China

Judging the Market: Judicial Independence, the Rule of Law, and Economic Development

The nature and significance of the political ideal of the Rule of Law: Hayek, Buchanan, and beyond

The Rule of Law and State Legitimacy

On the Development of the Rule of Law in Economy Developed Area

Constitutionalism, Rule of Law, and Economic Development: A Preliminary Theoretical Framework

The Rule of Law State as a Dynamic Phenomenon: A New Approach to the Concept

An Elementary Approach to the Rule of Law

The “Legal-civil Relations” in the Rule-of-law Practice of Contemporary China

A Democracy-Friendly Theory of the Rule of Law

Methodologies of Rule of Law Research: Why Legal Philosophy Needs Empirical and Doctrinal Scholarship

Institutional Transplantation and the Rule of Law: How This Interdisciplinary Method Can Enhance the Legitimacy of International Organisations

The Official Story of the Law

Neoliberal Law: unintended consequences of market-friendly law reforms

Relation between Constitutions, Socioeconomics and The Rule of Law: a quantitative thermodynamic approach

The Realm of Criminal Law

Triangulation of Theoretical and Empirical Conceptualizations Related to the Rule of Law

The Legal Dimensions of Rule of Law Promotion in EU Foreign Policy – EU Treaty Imperatives and Rule of Law Conditionality in the Foreign Trade and Development Nexus

The Rule of Law as a Well-Established and Well-Defined Principle of EU Law

Does expenditure in public governance guarantee less corruption? Non-linearities and complementarities of the rule of law