Abstract:Background and objectives: The higher clinical significance of central aortic blood pressure (CABP) compared to peripheral blood pressures has been extensively demonstrated. Accordingly, many methods for noninvasively estimating CABP have been proposed. However, there still lacks a systematic comparison of existing methods, especially in terms of how they differ in the ability to tolerate individual differences or measurement errors. The present study was designed to address this gap. Methods: A large-scale 'virtual subject' dataset (n = 600) was created using a computational model of the cardiovascular system, and applied to examine several classical CABP estimation methods, including the direct method, generalized transfer function (GTF) method, n-point moving average (NPMA) method, second systolic pressure of periphery (SBP2) method, physical model-based wave analysis (MBWA) method, and suprasystolic cuff-based waveform reconstruction (SCWR) method. The errors of CABP estimation were analyzed and compared among methods with respect to the magnitude/distribution, correlations with physiological/hemodynamic factors, and sensitivities to noninvasive measurement errors. Results: The errors of CABP estimation exhibited evident inter-method differences in terms of the mean and standard deviation (SD). Relatively, the estimation errors of the methods adopting pre-trained algorithms (i.e., the GTF and SCWR methods) were overall smaller and less sensitive to variations in physiological/hemodynamic conditions and random errors in noninvasive measurement of brachial arterial blood pressure (used for calibrating peripheral pulse wave). The performances of all the methods worsened following the introduction of random errors to peripheral pulse wave (used for deriving CABP), as characterized by the enlarged SD and/or increased mean of the estimation errors. Notably, the GTF and SCWR methods did not exhibit a better capability of tolerating pulse wave errors in comparison with other methods. Conclusions: Classical noninvasive methods for estimating CABP were found to differ considerably in both the accuracy and error source, which provided theoretical evidence for understanding the specific advantages and disadvantages of each method. Knowledge about the method-specific error source and sensitivities of errors to different physiological/hemodynamic factors may contribute as theoretical references for interpreting clinical observations and exploring factors underlying large estimation errors, or provide guidance for optimizing existing methods or developing new methods.

An analysis of the differences between the peripheral arterial and the central arterial blood pressures

Blood Pressure Measurement Multicentre Trial

Association of Central Arterial Blood Pressure and Left Ventricular Hypertrophy in Patients with Chronic Kidney Disease

Discrepancy Of Blood Pressure Between The Brachial Artery And Radial Artery

In silico data-based comparison of the accuracy and error source of various methods for noninvasively estimating central aortic blood pressure

The Effect of Three Different Cuff/Arm Circumference Ratios Ranging over 80% on Cuff Blood Pressure Measurements

Comparative Analysis of the Measurement Outcome Between Invasive Intra-arterial Blood Pressure of Nuchal Arteries and Conventional Cuff Blood Pressure

The significance of measuring central aortic systolic blood pressure among normotensive crowds

[Hypertension and Peripheral Arterial Diseases].

Comparison of Central and Peripheral Arterial Blood Pressure Gradients in Critically Ill Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

[Association Between Coronary Artery Stenosis and Peripheral Artery Function in Normotensive and Hypertensive Patients with Coronary Artery Disease].

Contrast Analysis on the Differences of Blood Pressure in Both Left and Right Side Brachial Artery of College Students

Central Over Peripheral Blood Pressure: An Emerging Issue in Hypertension Research

Optimization and validation of a suprasystolic brachial cuff‐based method for noninvasively estimating central aortic blood pressure

COMPARISON OF CENTRAL SYSTOLIC BLOOD PRESSURE (CSBP) ESTIMATED BY DIRECT CENTRAL BLOOD PRESSURE (DCBP) FORMULA AND RADIAL TONOMETRY BY SPIGMOCOR: AN INVASIVE VALIDATION STUDY

Associations between central and brachial blood pressure in patients with hypertension and aortovascular disease: Implications for clinical practice

Relationship between systolic blood pressure difference of inter arms and brachial-ankle pulse wave velocity

PS-C08-1: ACCURACY OF CUFF BLOOD PRESSURE AND SYSTOLIC BLOOD PRESSURE AMPLIFICATION

Association Between Inter-Arm Difference In Sbp And Central Blood Pressure In A Beijing Community Cohort

Assessing the Accuracy of Systolic Aortic Pressure Estimation From a Brachial Cuff Alone: A Comparison With Radial Tonometry

Comparative Study of Invasive Blood Pressure and Non-invasive Blood Pressure in General Anesthesia