Analysis of the efficacy of large decompressive craniectomy in severe traumatic brain injury
LIU Weiguo,FENG Junfeng,YANG Xiaofeng,SHEN Hong,ZHENG Xuesheng,PAN Desheng,YAO Yu,刘伟国,冯军峰,杨小锋,沈宏,郑学胜,潘德生,姚瑜
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3760/j.issn:1671-0282.2005.12.014
IF: 1.473
2005-01-01
Journal of Emergency Medicine
Abstract:Objective To investigate the role of large decompressive craniectomy(LDC) in the management of severe traumatic brain injury(TBI) and very severe TBI,compared with the routine decompressive craniectomy(RDC).Methods Clinical data on 263 patients with severe TBI who were treated by either LDC or RDC in our department were reviewed.One hundred and Thirty-five patients,including 54 very severe TBIs,underwent LDC.Another 128 patients,including 49 very severe TBIs,underwent RDC.Outcomes and postoperative complications of the two kinds of surgical management were compared and analyzed at 6 month follow-up.Results Ninty-six patients(71.7%) obtained effective outcome in the LDC group,while only 75 cases(58.6%) did so in the RDC group.Moreover,the efficacy of LDC to treat very severe TBI was also higher than that of RDC(63.0% vs.36.7%).The incidence of reoperation due to refractory intracranial pressure(ICP) in LDC was significantly lower than that in the RDC group(P<0.05),while the incidence of delayed intracranial hematoma and subdural effusion was significantly higher than that in the RDC group(P<0.05).Conclusion LDC had superiority over RDC in improving the outcome of severe TBI,especially the very severe ones.LDC also could efficiently reduce the chance of reoperation due to refractory ICP,but not the incidence of overall complications.On the contrary,it increased the incidence of delayed intra-cranial hematomas and contralateral subdural effusion.