Efficacy of Standard Large Trauma Craniectomy for Severe Traumatic Brain Injured Patients with Tentorial Herniation:A Multicenter Prospective Randomized Controlled Study

江基尧,李维平,徐蔚,许文辉,黄强,朱诚,王宇,罗其中
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3760/j.issn:1001-2346.2004.01.010
2004-01-01
Abstract:Objective To compare the effect of standard large trauma craniectomy versus routine temporoparietal craniectomy on outcome of 447 severe traumatic brain injured patients with tentorial herniation (GCS(8). Methods At 6 medical centers Four hundred forty seven patients with an admission Glasgow Coma Scale score of 8 or less were randomly divided into two groups:standard large trauma craniectomy group (n=217) got unilateral or bilateral frontotemporoparietal bone flap(12cm×15cm)and routine temporoparietal craniectomy group (n=230) received routine tem poroparietal scalp flap (6cm×8cm). All patients got their CT scan. Results Glasgow outcome scale at 6 month follow-up 76 cases got favorable outcome (35.0%) including 42 good recovery and 34 moderate deficit other 141 cases got unfavorable outcome (65.0%) including 69 severe deficits 9 persistent vegetative status and 63 were dead in standard large trauma craniectomy group. However only 58 cases got favorable outcome (25.2%) including 31 good recovery and 27 moderate deficit and other 172 cases were unfavorable outcome (74.8%) including 80 severe deficits 7 persistent vegetative status and 85 were dead in routine temporoparietal cranie ctomy group (P0.05). Intracranial pressure decreased faster and better in stand ard trauama craniectomy than in routine craniectomy (P0.05). Furthermore the incidence of delayed intracranial hematomas reoperation incisional hernia and CSF fistulae in standard trauma craniectomy group was lower than those in routine craniectomy group (P0.05). However the incidence of acute encephalomyelocele traumatic seizure and intracranial infection was not significantly different between two groups (P0.05). Conclusion Standard large trauma craniectomy significantly improves the outcome of severe traumatic brain injured patients with refractory intracranial hypertension which indicate that standard large trauma craniectomy but not routine temporoparietal craniectomy should be routinely performed in those patients who suffer from unilateral or bilateral tentorial hernia tion with frontotemporoparietal contusion and intracerebral or subdural hematomas.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?