Clinical Analysis of Surgery Treatment of Severe Traumatic Brain Injury

WANG Chong-qian,TANG Zhi-wei,YANG Zhi-yong,WANG Jin-kun,WANG Wei-min,WANG Lei
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1003-4706.2012.09.029
2012-01-01
Abstract:Objective To explore some clinical evidences to frame standardized severe traumatic brain surgeries by comparing the healing efficacies and aftermath-complications of standard large trauma craniotomy(SLTC)and routine temporoparietal craniotomy(RTC).Methods We reviewed the effect and complications of 86 severe traumatic brain injured patients who received different type of craniotomies in the hospital during January 2005 to December 2007.Among those patients,34 were treated by SLTCs;41 received RTCs;9 were applied bi-frontal craniotomies;and 2 were implemented bilateral large craniotomies.The major focus is on the effect and complications of SLTCs and RTCs.Results By using GOS scoring at 6 month follow-up,16 cases were concluded positive healed(47.1%),which include 8(23.5%)well recovery cases and 8(23.5%)moderate deficits cases.Other 18 cases were determined as negative healed(52.9%),of which 9 were severe deficits,12 were in persistent vegetative conditions,and 7 died during their SLTCs.However,comparing to the SLTC,patients who received RTCs were statistically less advantaged.Only 9 cases were positive cures(22.0%),including 5 well-recovery and 4 moderate deficits.Other 32 cases were assessed as negative cures(78.0%),for which 13 were severe deficits,4 were under persistent vegetative conditions and 15 died in RTCs(P0.05).However,except for incisional hernia,the incidences of complications were not significantly different between two groups(P0.05).Conclusion For traumatic brain injured patients,SLTCs improve their healing outcomes significantly when compared to RTCs,but SLTCs couldn't reduce the complicationsincidence.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?