Effect of minimally invasive surgery for intracerebral hemorrhage: a single center retrospective analysis
谭潇潇,付雄洁,俞晓波,严锋,陈高
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3877/cma.j.issn.2095-123X.2022.01.003
2022-01-01
Abstract:Objective:To evaluated the safety, efficacy and longterm prognosis of different minimally invasive surgery treatments in patient with intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH).Methods:Patients with basal ganglia hemorrhage, admitted to Neurosurgery Department of Second Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University from January 2019 to December 2020, were divided into three groups: small bone window craniotomy (SBWC) group, endoscopic surgery (ES) group and stereotactic hematoma aspiration followed by urokinase (SHAU) group. The baseline characteristics, perioperative information and lone-term outcome data of the three groups were analyzed to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of different minimally invasive treatments in the treatment of ICH.Results:There were 356 patients in this group, including 116 cases in ES group, 135 cases in SHAU group and 105 cases in SBWC group. No significant differences were observed among all three groups the baseline characteristics, including age, sex, hematoma location, GCS score, NIHSS score and hematoma volume (P>0.05). There were significant differences among the three groups with respect to the operative blood loss and operative time (P<0.05). The rebleeding rate in the SHAU groups was significantly higher than in the other two groups (P<0.05). The evacuation rate 24 h after operation in AMWC and ES groups was significantly higher than SHAU group (P<0.05). The evacuation rate 3 d after operation in ES group was better than that in SBWC group and SHAU group (P<0.05), but there was no significant difference between SBWC group and SHAU group (P>0.05). On 7 d after surgery, the NIHSS score in ES and SHAU groups were significantly higher than the AMWC group, the good prognosis rate in ES and SHAU groups were significantly higher than the AMWC group (P<0.05). Six months after surgery, the NIHSS score in ES and SHAU groups were significantly higher than the AMWC group, the good prognosis rate in ES and SHAU groups were significantly higher than the AMWC group (P<0.05).Conclusion:Minimally invasive surgery has a definite effect on the treatment of ICH and can significantly improve the long-term outcome. Among them, endoscopic surgery has high hematoma removal efficiency and fewer complications.