Hypertensive intracerebral hemorrhage: surgical timing and prognosis

Ke YE,Qing-sheng XU,Ping LAN,Ying TONG,Ren-ya ZHAN,Yong-qing ZHOU
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-6880.2013.03.005
2013-01-01
Abstract:Objective To investigate the effect of ultra-early or early surgical treatment on the aged and middle-aged patients with hypertensive intracerebral hemorrhage(ICH).Methods Patients with hypertensive ICH were classified into the aged(range from 60 to 83 years old,57 cases) and middle-aged(range from 39 to 59 years old,46 cases) groups.Of 103 patients,26(45.6%) in the aged group and 22(47.8%) in the middle-aged group underwent ultra-early surgical treatment(within 7 h),while 31(54.4%) in the aged group and 24(52.2%) in the middle-aged group were treated by early surgical management(within 7-48 h).The activity of daily living(ADL) measure was used to assess the outcome of patients with hypertensive ICH after surgery.Results Mortality in the aged group was significant lower after ultra-early surgical treatment compared with early surgical treatment(7.0% vs 32.2%,χ2= 5.134,P < 0.05).In addition,in the aged group 12 patients after ultra-early surgery and 6 patients after early surgery were in ADL grade Ⅰ(46.1% vs 19.3%,χ2 = 4.7,P < 0.05).However,there was no statistically significant difference in outcome in the middle-aged group after ultra-early compared with that after early surgical treatment(all P > 0.05).Conclusion Ultra-early surgical treatment can bring on a better outcome for aged but not for middle-aged patients with hypertensive ICH in comparison to early surgical treatment.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?