Abstract:The integrated development of urban and rural areas requires that the government take responsibility for the overall development of the countryside. Chinese agricultural and rural policies characterized by state intervention and government leadership have played an important role in promoting agricultural development and increasing farmers' incomes as well as balancing development in urban and rural areas. However, the effectiveness of current agricultural policies in promoting agricultural productivity is now clearly leveling off. Given this situation, the authors argue that it is imperative to construct a new analytical framework featuring government regulation and guidance of agricultural and rural development. In this framework, the government must clearly define the boundaries between its activities and those of the market and rural social organizations. While fully respecting the fundamental role of the market in allocation of resources and rural self-management, the government should exercise its power as a backstop. Further, the government needs to establish a logical sequence for government functions such as formulating the basic operating system of the market and society, correcting market failure and social dysfunction and cultivating market/social entities. To use this new analytical framework to strengthen and improve its regulation and guidance of agricultural and rural development, the government needs to reform the basic rural management and agricultural support and protection systems and to pay attention to the cultivation of market entities in agricultural production on the basis of agricultural marketization. Furthermore, it needs to construct a basic urban-rural integrated public service system with the government as the leading actor, carry out innovations in the management system of rural society and fully mobilize the social forces to take part in the administration of public affairs. It also needs to reconstruct the system of government administration and management to ensure the thorough implementation of agricultural and rural development policies.

Research Methods and Viewpoints of Rural Public Goods

STUDY ON THE CONSISTENCY OF THE RURAL PUBLIC GOODS CONSTRUCTION——Based on Empirical Study on Survey Data of "ten Counties and A Hundred Villages"

Empirical Analysis of Factors Affecting Villagers’ Demand Preference for Public Goods under Villagers’ Self-governance

Urban Rural Planning Methods for Expanding the Domestic Economy

Study on the Development of Rural Education:Retrospect and Prospect

Why is Public Goods Underprovided in Rural China?

Review of Recent Rural Social Policy Research of China

The Supply of Rural Public Utility and the Construction a New Comprehensive Well-off Society in Rural Areas

Measures of Optimizing the Rural Public Service Supply Mechanism

Strategies for the Provision of Public Goods in Rural China——A Comparative Analysis

The Review and Evaluation of the Domestic and Foreign Research on Rural Public Service System

The Role of Agriculture in China and Policy Options in the Socialist New Countryside Building

The Relationship Between Government on One Side and the Market and Society on the Other in China's Agricultural and Rural Development: an Analytical Framework

Review on Rural Homestead Studies

Research on the Water Supply Construction in Rural Areas

An Analysis on the Feasibility of the Multi-subjects Participating in the Supply of Rural Public Goods

Research on the Collaborative Mechanism of Rural Public Service Supply

On Diversified Suppliers of Rural Public Goods——Based on Polycentric Governance Theory

A Study on the Construction of New Socialist Countryside that Focuses on Raising Rural Residents' Quality of Life:Based on the Survey of 1 029 Rural Residents

Understanding the shortboard of regional sustainable development: fairness and efficiency of rural public resource allocation in China

The subjective well-being effect of public goods provided by village collectives: Evidence from China