Application of Half Hepatic Block Combined with Low Central Venous Pressure Control in Liver Resection
Xuezhi WANG,Wenjie SONG,Zhengcai LIU,Desheng WANG
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1006-2084.2017.06.038
2017-01-01
Abstract:Objective To investigate the effects of half hepatic block combined with low central venous pressure(LCVP) control on blood loss in liver resection and evaluate its influence on hepatic and renal function.Methods Eighty patients undergoing hepatectomy from Jun.2013 to Dec.2015 in Xijing Hospital were divided into a LCVP group (40 cases) and a normal central venous pressure group (NCVP group,40 cases).The patients in the NCVP group maintained central venous pressure on 6-12 cmH2O,while LCVP group maintained 0-5 cmH2O of central venous pressure.The operation time,blood loss,blood transfusion and postoperative 1,3,5 d liver and renal function of the two groups were compared.Results The operative time had no significant difference between the two groups.The blood loss in the NCVP group was significantly more than that in the LCVP group[(1225±674) mL vs (304±181) mL,P<0.05].The values of alanine aminotransferase(ALT),aspartate aminotransferase(AST) and tolal bilirubin (TBil) in the two groups were highest on the 1st day after operation,then decreased later and reached around the preoperative levels on the 5th day.There were no statistically significant differences between groups and groups·time point interaction effect (P>0.05),while there were statistically significant differences between time points of the two groups(P<0.05).ALB in the two groups had significantly decreased on the 1st day after operation,then slightly decreased later,while ALB in the LCVP group was less than that in the NCVP group.There were statistically significant differences between groups,time points (P<0.05),no statistical significance on the interaction effect of groups·time point(P>0.05).BUN in the LCVP group was higher than that in the NCVP group after operation,and increased slightly on the 1st day,then decline gradually.There were statistically significant differences between two groups,time points (P<0.05),no statistical significance on the interaction effect of groups·time point (P>0.05).Serum creatinine had slightly decreased on the 1st,3rd,5th day after operation in both groups,and there were statistically significant differences between time points of the two groups(P<0.05),while there were no statistical significance between groups and groups·time point interaction effect(P>0.05).Conclusion Both resection methods are safe and effective.LCVP group is superior to NCVP group in control of hemorrhage and blood transfusion during liver resection,and has positive effects on postoperative liver function recovery.LCVP has good application value in liver resection,therefore is worthy of popularization.