Abstract:OBJECTIVE:To retrospectively explore the clinical efficacies and applicability of anatomical vascular occlusion (AVO) in hepatectomy for grand primary hepatocarcinoma at different locations. METHODS:A total of 212 grand primary hepatocarcinoma cases undergoing hepatectomy were divided into 2 groups by vascular occlusion in the process of resection: AVO group (n = 97) and Pringle group (Pringle maneuver, n = 115). According to whether or not tumor was adjacent to main vessels, the cases were divided into 2 types: centrally (n = 98) and peripherally (n = 114) located lesions. And the perioperative outcomes were compared between 2 groups totally and by types respectively. RESULTS:No significance existed between the AVO and Pringle groups in the demographic characteristics and tumor background (P > 0.05). For total cases, there were no significant differences between 2 groups regarding the intraoperative blood loss volume ((632 ± 437) ml vs (546 ± 549) ml, P = 0.217) and the blood transfusion requirement (44.3% vs 33.0%, P = 0.092). The AVO group showed significantly better postoperative liver functions in terms of serum levels of total bilirubin and aminotransferase (P > 0.05). But no significant difference was found between 2 groups in the postoperative complication rate (18.6% vs 22.6%, P = 0.469) and hospital stay duration ((10.5 ± 4.8) vs (11.8 ± 5.6) days, P = 0.087). In centrally located lesions: the AVO group showed a significantly smaller intraoperative blood loss volume ((722 ± 492) ml vs (1032 ± 618) ml, P = 0.007) and blood transfusion requirement (45.6% vs 68.3%, P = 0.026). Also the AVO group showed significantly better postoperative liver functions in terms of serum levels of total bilirubin and aminotransferase (P < 0.01). As a consequence, the AVO group had a significantly lower postoperative complication rate (19.3% vs 39.0%, P = 0.031) and a shorter hospital stay duration ((10.7 ± 5.0) days vs (13.0 ± 6.2) days, P = 0.042). In peripheral located lesions: there were significantly larger intraoperative blood loss volume (504 ± 307 vs 278 ± 237 ml, P = 0.000) and blood transfusion requirement (42.5% vs 13.5%, P = 0.001) in the AVO group. The postoperative liver functions (total bilirubin and aminotransferase levels, P > 0.05), postoperative complication rate (17.5% vs 13.5%, P = 0.808) and hospital stay duration ((10.3 ± 4.6) days vs (11.1 ± 5.1) days, P = 0.429) showed no significant differences between 2 groups. CONCLUSION:The technique of AVO is unsuitable for all types of grand hepatocarcinoma. Whether or not the tumor is adjacent to main vessels is an important consideration of choosing the vascular control technique. Considering the risk of vascular damage in the process of hepatectomy, the AVO technique is indicated for the resection of central lesions but not for peripheral lesions.

Comparation of Hemodynamic Changes Between Two Total Hepatic Vascular Exclusion(thve and SHVE)in Liver Neoplasm Resections

Surgical shunts compared with endoscopic sclerotherapy for the treatment of variceal bleeding in adults with portal hypertension: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Role of anatomic hepatectomy performed under vascular exclusion in management of hepatolithiasis]

Major Hepatic Resection under Total Vascular Exclusion

Comparative study of 3 kinds of hepatic blood flow occlusion in hepatectomy for primary liver cancer complicated with liver cirrhosis

Selection of the method of hepatic vascular control during resection of liver carcinoma

Regional Hepatic Vascular Exclusion in Hepatectomy

Role and Significance of Extrahepatic Control of Hepatic Vein and Inferior Vena Cava in Difficult Hepatectomies for Patients with Liver Tumors

Surgical treatment for huge hepatic cavernous hemangioma closely attached to inf erior vena cava

Liver Resection Under Total Hepatic Vascular Exclusion with In Situ Hypothermic Isolated Hepatic Perfusion for Advanced Liver Tumors

Comparison of the long-term therapeutic effect between spleno-renal shunt combined with pericardial devascularization and simple pericardial devascularization

The clinical assessment of selective devascularization for the treatment of portal hypertension

Hepatic resection versus transcatheter arterial chemoembolization for the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma with hepatic vein tumor thrombus

HEPATIC VEINS EXCLUSION DURING THE PROCESS OF SEVERE HEPATIC TRAUME

The Application of Selective Hepatic Inflow Vascular Occlusion with Anterior Approach in Liver Resection: Effectiveness in Managing Major Complications and Long-Term Survival

Prospective comparison of splenorenal shunt combined with pericardial devascularization versus pericardial devascularization

Comparison of Different Chemotherapeutic Patterns and Drug-Administration Ways after Resection of Hepatocellular Carcinoma with Tumor Thrombi in Portal Vein

The Impact of Different Hepatic Vascular Occlusion Methods on Hepatic Parenchymal Function in Partial Hepatectomy

Liver Vein Deprivation Versus Portal Vein Embolization: Retrospective Review of Safety and Effectiveness

Effects of Combined Splenorenal Shunt Devascularization and Devascularization Only on Hemodynamics of the Portal Venous System in Patients with Portal Hypertension.

[Applicability of Anatomical Vascular Occlusion in Hepatectomy for Grand Hepatocarcinoma].