Abstract:OBJECTIVE:To retrospectively explore the clinical efficacies and applicability of anatomical vascular occlusion (AVO) in hepatectomy for grand primary hepatocarcinoma at different locations. METHODS:A total of 212 grand primary hepatocarcinoma cases undergoing hepatectomy were divided into 2 groups by vascular occlusion in the process of resection: AVO group (n = 97) and Pringle group (Pringle maneuver, n = 115). According to whether or not tumor was adjacent to main vessels, the cases were divided into 2 types: centrally (n = 98) and peripherally (n = 114) located lesions. And the perioperative outcomes were compared between 2 groups totally and by types respectively. RESULTS:No significance existed between the AVO and Pringle groups in the demographic characteristics and tumor background (P > 0.05). For total cases, there were no significant differences between 2 groups regarding the intraoperative blood loss volume ((632 ± 437) ml vs (546 ± 549) ml, P = 0.217) and the blood transfusion requirement (44.3% vs 33.0%, P = 0.092). The AVO group showed significantly better postoperative liver functions in terms of serum levels of total bilirubin and aminotransferase (P > 0.05). But no significant difference was found between 2 groups in the postoperative complication rate (18.6% vs 22.6%, P = 0.469) and hospital stay duration ((10.5 ± 4.8) vs (11.8 ± 5.6) days, P = 0.087). In centrally located lesions: the AVO group showed a significantly smaller intraoperative blood loss volume ((722 ± 492) ml vs (1032 ± 618) ml, P = 0.007) and blood transfusion requirement (45.6% vs 68.3%, P = 0.026). Also the AVO group showed significantly better postoperative liver functions in terms of serum levels of total bilirubin and aminotransferase (P < 0.01). As a consequence, the AVO group had a significantly lower postoperative complication rate (19.3% vs 39.0%, P = 0.031) and a shorter hospital stay duration ((10.7 ± 5.0) days vs (13.0 ± 6.2) days, P = 0.042). In peripheral located lesions: there were significantly larger intraoperative blood loss volume (504 ± 307 vs 278 ± 237 ml, P = 0.000) and blood transfusion requirement (42.5% vs 13.5%, P = 0.001) in the AVO group. The postoperative liver functions (total bilirubin and aminotransferase levels, P > 0.05), postoperative complication rate (17.5% vs 13.5%, P = 0.808) and hospital stay duration ((10.3 ± 4.6) days vs (11.1 ± 5.1) days, P = 0.429) showed no significant differences between 2 groups. CONCLUSION:The technique of AVO is unsuitable for all types of grand hepatocarcinoma. Whether or not the tumor is adjacent to main vessels is an important consideration of choosing the vascular control technique. Considering the risk of vascular damage in the process of hepatectomy, the AVO technique is indicated for the resection of central lesions but not for peripheral lesions.

Comparative study of 3 kinds of hepatic blood flow occlusion in hepatectomy for primary liver cancer complicated with liver cirrhosis

Meta-analysis of efficacy of laparoscopic hepatectomy versus open hepatectomy for hepatocarcinoma.

Associating liver partition and portal vein ligation for staged hepatectomy for HCC with liver cirrhosis:A report of 1 case

Totally laparoscopic ALPPS for primary liver cancer complicated with cirrhosis----application of ;round-the-liver ligation to replace parenchymal transection

A Report of 47 Cases of Hepatectomy in Benign Occupied Disease of the Liver

The Impact of Different Hepatic Vascular Occlusion Methods on Hepatic Parenchymal Function in Partial Hepatectomy

Selection of the method of hepatic vascular control during resection of liver carcinoma

Perioperative Analysis of Laparoscopic Liver Resection with Different Methods of Hepatic Inflow Occlusion

Application of hepatic portal occlusion with vascular clamp in complex laparoscopic left hemihepatectomy

Comparation of Hemodynamic Changes Between Two Total Hepatic Vascular Exclusion(thve and SHVE)in Liver Neoplasm Resections

The Significance of Liver Hanging Maneuver in Liver-Splitting Anterior Approach for Hepatectomy

Ex-situ liver surgery without veno-venous bypass

[Applicability of Anatomical Vascular Occlusion in Hepatectomy for Grand Hepatocarcinoma].

The difference in prolonged continuous and intermittent Pringle maneuver during complex hepatectomy for hepatocellular carcinoma patients with chronic liver disease: A retrospective cohort study

Surgical treatment for huge hepatic cavernous hemangioma closely attached to inf erior vena cava

Comparison of Hepatectomy with or Without Hepatic Inflow Occlusion in Patients with Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Single-Center Experience

SIGNIFICANCE OF HEMIHEPATIC VASCULAR CONTROL IN HEMIHEPATECTOMY FOR HEPATOCARCINOMA PATIENTS WITH CIRRHOSIS

Retrograde Hepatectomy for Liver Cancer Patients: Experience in 178 Cases

Liver resection under selective hepatic inflow and outflow occlusions

Comparison of percutaneous microwave/radiofrequency ablation liver partition and portal vein embolization versus transarterial chemoembolization and portal vein embolization for planned hepatectomy with insufficient future liver remnant

Comparison among Three Surgical Techniques for Orthotopic Liver Transplantation