Laparoscopic Left Hemihepatectomy under Occlusion of the Left Inflow and Outflow
Xiujun Cai,Zhifei Wang,Hong Yu,Yifan Wang,Xiao Liang,Shu-you Peng
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/00029330-200810020-00030
2008-01-01
Abstract:Laparoscopic hepatectomy seems to be difficult because of the ease of bleeding from the liver parachyma during resection. This is not easily controlled under the laparoscope, especially during right or left hemihepatectomy, except for resection of the peripheral liver or left lateral segment when porta hepatis dissection is not indicated. Although both inflow and outflow control seems to be ideal in laparoscopic left hepatectomy, there have not been many reports of this. In addition to the high technical demands and the time required, any injury of the main hepatic veins or vena cava during the procedure will cause catastrophic bleeding and air embolism. Recently, we succeeded in achieving inflow and outflow occlusion during laparoscopic left hemihepatectomy in four cases, with satisfactory results. CLINICAL DATA Patient selection A total of 14 cases of laparoscopic left hemihepatectomy were performed in the Department of General Surgery, Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital, College of Medicine, Zhejiang University, China. Among these, we performed both inflow and outflow control before hepatectomy in four patients, of whom the average age was 48 years (range, 38-58 years). All these patients were evaluated by means of B-mode ultrasonography, CT and MRI before surgery. Three patients were diagnosed with left hepatolithiasis and gallbladder stone, while the other had hepatolithiasis in both right and left liver, along with common bile duct stones. Stones were mostly located in the left liver. All four patients had cholecystitis. The patients were operated on for unilateral hepatolithiasis with severe parenchymal fibrosis or atrophy. Patients with extrahepatic bile duct stricture, suppurative cholangitis, Child C class liver function or previous cholangiojejunostomy were excluded. The operations were performed by the same team. All patients gave informed consent before surgery. Surgical procedures Surgery was carried out under general anesthesia. The patients were placed in the supine position, and pneumo-peritoneum was established using carbon dioxide (14 mmHg). Four entries were made (Figure 1), including the observation port below the umbilicus, main manipulation port below the left costal margin for left hemihepatectomy, and two assistant ports at the right flank area. Two surgeons were in charge of liver transection, and another controlled the aspirator by clamping the aspiration tube with forceps, which were loosened whenever aspiration was needed. Firstly, an exploration was carried out and the liver was examined by a 30° laparoscope, and the liver lesion was located by intraoperative ultrasonography. A laparoscopic multifunctional operative dissector (LMOD) was introduced through the main manipulation port. After adhesions between the gallbladder and duodenum were freed, the inferior liver was elevated and mobilized upward to expose the hepatic hilum. The hepatoduodenal ligament was dissected using the LMOD and laparoscopic aspirator alternatively on the left side of the hepatic portal, and a laparoscopic aspirator and the specific technique of pushing, curettage, aspiration and coagulation were applied, as previously described.1,2 The common hepatic artery and its left branches were isolated. By meticulous blunt dissection, the hepatic artery and its branches were visualized. The left branch was divided near the bifurcation and clamped (Figure 2) with absorbable clips (12-mm Lopro-Clip; Tyco Healthcare, Gosport, Hampshire, UK). The distal end of the branch of the divided artery was raised up to expose the left branch of the portal vein, which was treated by dissection and clamping with an absorbable clip (Figure 3), and left selective inflow occlusion was completed. After this, the ligamentum teres hepatis and falciform ligament were dissected to the top part of the liver, the anterior and posterior layers of left coronary ligament were cut, and the end of the falciform ligament was retracted in the left anterior direction to give better exposure. The left triangular ligament was dissected to the left side of the suprahepatic vena cava. After dissecting the sheath of the vein using the LMOD, a laparoscopic dissector was applied by the assistant to hold one vessel to create tension. Using the above-mentioned dissection maneuver, the space between the veins was explored, and the tissue was further divided by a laparoscopic dissector to enlarge the space between the liver and middle hepatic vein from the front. The left lobe of the liver was then completely mobilized from the diaphragm and turned to the right side, the gastrohepatic ligament was divided, and the ligamentum venosum was exposed and opened. This allowed exposure of the window between the vena cava and the left hepatic vein. By dissection in this space, it was possible to mobilize the left hepatic veins from behind. Then, from the front, the venae hepaticae intermediae was retracted slightly to the right side, a mixter dissector time-consuming procedure on the patient's condition 90 degree was applied from the back of the left hepatic vein with meticulous attention, and the left hepatic vein was held lightly and pulled to the left side to better allow the dissector to go through the space. After the left hepatic vein was isolated for 1-1.5 cm before it joined the common trunk, it was clamped with absorbable clips (Figure 4). After the completion of inflow and outflow occlusion, an ischemic change appeared in the left lobe of the liver, and the cutting plane was indicated.3 The power of the LMOD was adjusted to 120 W, and the liver on each side of the cutting plane was retracted to create tension. A cutting line was made and the liver capsule was opened with the LMOD, and laparoscopic hepatectomy by curettage and aspiration (LHCA) was performed.2 Vascular and biliary structures, including all the communicating branches encountered along the transection plane, were exposed by blunt dissection, abrading, curettage and dissection of the surrounding parenchyma, in parallel to those structures, until a 1-cm segment was freed. Minor structures (diameter <3 mm) were coagulated, and the larger structures (diameter ≥3 mm) were clamped and divided. After dissection of the left hepatic lobe, the cutting plane of the liver was thoroughly examined and hemostasis was carried out using the LMOD. Some of the clips were secured again. An aseptic plastic drainage bag was put through the trocar and the resected liver was moved into the bag before being sealed with a specific clip. A small incision about 4 cm long was made by connecting the two right trocar sites. The bag containing the sample was removed through the incision. Intraoperative cholangiography was performed through the cyst duct; three cases showed no evidence of stenosis, and one showed stones in the right hepatic lobe and common bile duct as diagnosed preoperatively. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy was carried out in three patients and combined laparoscopic common bile duct exploration in one in whom stones were removed completely from the right liver, and a T-tube was placed in common bile duct. Fibrin glue was sprayed on the cut surface and a drainage tube was placed beneath the liver.Figure 1.: Port locations for laparoscopic left hemihepatectomy.Figure 2. Common hepatica artery and its division to left branches (arrow) were isolated, the latter was clipped with absorbable clips near the bifurcation.Figure 3. Left branches of portal vein was identified and clamped (arrow).Figure 4. The left hepatic vein was isolated and clamped with absorbable clip (arrow).Treatment outcome The technique of laparoscopic selective inflow and outflow occlusion was completed uneventfully in all patients. There was no intraoperative and postoperative morbidity or mortality. No massive bleeding occurred during dissection of the hepatic hilum or hepatic vein. The mean blood loss was 325 ml (range, 200-500 ml) and the mean operating time was 211 minutes (range, 145-360 minutes, including the time of the associated operations). All patients had bedside activity within 24 hours and started oral intake on the first postoperative day. The mean length of postoperative hospital stay was 6 days (range, 4-8 days). One month later, the patient with the T-tube showed stone retention in the right hepatic duct on postoperative T-tube cholangiography, but stones were not observed by choledochoscopy. DISCUSSION Concerns about laparoscopic liver resection have risen with regard to the liver exposure and bleeding control in cases of major vessel injury.4 The surgical technique commonly used for controlling bleeding in laparoscopic liver resection is portal triad clamping, but this may cause gastrointestinal congestion and ischemic-reperfusion injury to the remnant liver,5 which deviates from the purpose of minimally-invasive laparoscopic surgery. It is believed that laparoscopic left hemihepatectomy can be performed following the same rules as for open hepatic surgery, e.g., mobilization of the lobe, exploration of the parenchyma, Pringle maneuver, and selective occlusion of segmental pedicles, and the left hepatic vein can be performed similarly.6 Compared with traditional non-selective hepatic inflow occlusion, such a technique has many advantages. It can more effectively reduce bleeding from the cutting surface, and avoid reperfusion injury to the remaining liver, so as to reduce the incidence of live function failure; it can also prevent intraoperative hepatic vein rupture and air embolism; and for malignant liver tumor, it can prevent tumor cells from spreading via the hepatic vein. Despite the above advantages, this inflow and outflow control method in left laparoscopic hemihepatectomy has not often been reported.7-9 This is probably because it is not easily achieved in practice for the following reasons: (1) the high technical demands and length of time required; (2) the potential risk of injury of the main hepatic veins or vena cava; and (3) exposure of hepatic veins and outflow occlusion laparoscopically sometimes depends on the anatomy of the hepatic vein itself. The left hepatic vein runs in the left scissura (between segments II and III) and commonly joins the intermediate hepatic vein (from the principal scissura), prior to entering the vena cava, to form a common trunk (67.3%), or it enters the vena cava independently.10 Outflow control is only an indication for those whose left hepatic veins have a short extrahepatic course before joining the suprahepatic vena cava or common trunk. Laparoscopic hepatectomy has its own advantages over open hepatectomy. The 30° laparoscope provides a vertical view angle towards the facies diaphragmatica of the liver, which facilitates operating in a relatively small space from different angles, without having to completely mobilize the liver, and the operative field is also amplified by the laparoscope. Faster and more secure exposure of the portal triad allowed us to better deal with the hepatic veins and outflow occlusion. The four present cases were treated after experience was accumulated on 178 cases of laparoscopic hepatectomy, in which laparoscopic hepatic vascular inflow occlusion was performed to reduce hemorrhage during liver resection.11 One further advantage of our technique has also been described elsewhere.1,2 Exposure and management of every communication vascular branch in the cutting plane during parenchymal dissection, using the LMOD, reduces blood loss and contributes to bloodless laparoscopic hepatectomy, when combined with inflow and outflow occlusion. There is much to take into consideration when attempting exposure of the hepatic vein and outflow occlusion of the left hepatic vein. Firstly, the left lobe should not be too big, in order to provide sufficient space for vessel exposure and occlusion procedure. In most cases, the left lobe has to be lifted and dissected from behind. Similarly, O'Rourke and Fielding12 consider that the best exposure for the right hepatic vein during laparoscopic right hepatectomy is achieved from beneath the liver. By lifting the liver anteriorly using two 5-mm graspers to create a tunnel, short hepatic veins and the right hepatic vein are easier to divide and ligate than in standard open right hepatectomy, because there is no compression of the right lobe.12 In our experience, when the hepatic vein is difficult to dissect, dividing the lesser omentum and bringing the left lobe to the mid-abdomen facilitates this maneuver. Secondly, dissecting the portal hilum and hepatic vein is an extremely difficult task, with the risk of massive bleeding. The maneuver of cutting, tearing and coagulation should be avoided. The tip of an aspirator tube is a good instrument for blunt dissection. Thirdly, to avoid dividing the trunk or opposing branch of the hepatic artery and portal vein, the bifurcations should be identified before ligating and dividing their branches to the lobe that is to be resected. Fourthly, the lesion should not be located too near to the surface of the portal pedicle, as this will cause more adhesion, which will add to the surgical difficulty and risk. Contraindications also include tumors that approach or infiltrate the liver hilum, anatomical variations of the portal vein or hepatic artery, or dense adhesions around the hepatoduodenal ligament (due to prior operation or chemoembolization), which make portal dissection hazardous.13,14 Exposure of the left hepatic vein is extremely difficult and time-consuming. To avoid the mistake of clipping or slicing the common trunk, intermediate hepatic vein, or inferior vena cava, it is safer to clamp the left hepatic vein to the distal side, because it joins the common trunk or suprahepatic vena cava. If the hepatic vein is obscured by the posterior margin of the liver, it will be difficult to approach it from either below or above the liver prior to liver transection. In addition, dissection in a confined space carries the risk of injury to the hepatic veins and vena cava, which results in massive bleeding that is difficult to manage, even in open surgical conditions. Bradley et al9 have suggested that extensive portal pedicle dissection plus intraparenchymal hepatic vein isolation can prolong the procedure and increase the risk of hemorrhage. Therefore, outflow occlusion should be ceased immediately if the left hepatic vein is difficult to dissect. Sahani et al15 have suggested that threedimensional reconstruction by multi-slice spiral CT or MRI may help surgeons better understand the anatomy and variations of the hepatic vessels, and avoid unnecessary intraoperative injury. With a vertical view angle towards the facies diaphragmatica of the liver, by using a 30° laparoscope, it is not difficult to obtain the above information. By using the technique of LHCA, which was developed in 1998 by the authors,1-3,11 blunt dissection, aspiration and irrigation, cutting, and electric coagulation are all combined at the same time. Vessels in the transection plane are dissected safely and can be divided without blood loss. These techniques, together with both inflow and outflow occlusion, control the blood flow to the left lobe, which is via the left hepatic pedicle, left hepatic vein and small vessels in the transection plane, and thus facilitates laparoscopic left hemihepatectomy and increases surgical safety. Furthermore, these techniques do not affect blood flow to the right lobe which would be preserved. Gastrointestinal blood flow returns to the circulation through the right lobe, and gastrointestinal congestion and reperfusion injury, which commonly occur in portal inflow occlusion, can be avoided. By contrast with portal inflow occlusion, selective blood flow occlusion does not require surgeons to complete liver transection within a limited time. Surgeons can transect the liver parenchyma, dissect the blood vessels, and coagulate the raw surface carefully, and accidental injuries caused by quick liver transection can be prevented. Gas embolism is another dangerous complication and may occur in hemihepatectomy via the Venturi effect, which was described by Hatano et al16 in 1990. It is mainly caused by hepatic vein injury, especially under conditions of pneumoperitoneum. Using hepatic occlusion, carbon dioxide has much less chance of entering the bloodstream, and this complication can be prevented effectively. However, there is still a potential risk of gas embolism during dissection of the hepatic vein. In conclusion, despite the advantages of laparoscopic left hemihepatectomy under left inflow and outflow occlusion, and the four successful cases reported here, it is still too early to state that this technique is safe and can be widely applied. This is because of the risk of catastrophic bleeding or air embolism during hepatic vein dissection, and the adverse impact of the time-consuming procedure on the patient's condition. We believe that it is a feasible technique if performed by a group of experienced surgeons in selected patients. However, intentional exposure of the left hepatic vein to achieve outflow occlusion during laparoscopic hepatectomy outside the above-mentioned indications should be particularly avoided.