A comparison of MPCNL and ESWL for renal calculi in infants

Zhao Zhijian,Jia Jianye,Wu Wenqi,Zhong Wen,Zeng Guohua
DOI: https://doi.org/10.19558/j.cnki.10-1020/r.2013.03.014
2013-01-01
Abstract:Objective:The efficiency was compared between mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy(MPCNL)and extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy(ESWL)for monotherapy of renal calculi in infants<3years.Methods:Forty-six infants were treated with either SWL(22infants)or MPCNL monotherapy(24infants).Of the two groups, the mean age was(22.62±8.69)months and(23.50±6.64)month,while the stone size was(21.44±3.50)mm and(21.73±1.70)mm.Results:In MPCNL group,one had bilateral stones.Mean operating time was(76.20±23. 42)min with mean hospital stay of(14.13±5.80)d.The stone-free rates were 84%(21/25)after first session and 96%(24/25)after second-look procedure.Postoperative fever happened in 4(16%)cases.Hemoglobin drop was(8.54±4.40)g/L and no one needed blood transfusion.In ESWL group,the stone-free rate were 31.82%(7/22)after first session and 86.3%(19/22)after second session for 11infants(50%).Mean hospital stay was(6.64±2.28) d and 10cases(45.5%)happened complications.Hemoglobin drop was(10.64±12.67)g/L.For complications rate and re-treatment rate,MPCNL was lower than ESWL(P<0.05),and the stone-free rate was higher(P<0. 05),but the hospital stay and operate time was longer(P<0.05).Renal function evaluation after management(in terms of serum creatinine(SCr)and glomerular filtration rate(GFR)revealed no significant change in both groups. Conclusions:Compared to ESWL,MPCNL,with a higher success rate,a lower complication rate and re-treatment rate,was an effective option for the management of relatively larger stones in children(even in infants)when performed by experienced endourologists.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?