Comparison of MPCNL and ESWL for monotherapy of renal calculi in infants

Zhi-jian ZHAO,Guo-hua ZENG,Jian-ye JIA,wen-qi WU,Wen ZHONG
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.issn.1000-6702.2013.01.005
2013-01-01
Abstract:Objective To compare the efficiency between mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy (MPCNL) and extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) for monotherapy of renal calculi in infants less than 3 years.Methods Forty-six infants were treated with either SWL (22 infants) or MPCNL monotherapy (24 infants).The mean age was (22.6 ± 8.7) months vs (23.5 ± 6.6) months and the stone size was (21.4 ± 3.5) mm vs (21.7 ± 1.7) mm,and there were no significant difference.Results For MPCNL,mean operating time was (76.2 ± 23.4) min and mean hospital stay was (14.13 ± 5.8) d.The stone-free rates were 84.0% (21/25) after first session and 96.0% (24/25) after second-look procedure.Postoperative fever happened in 4 (16.0%) cases.Hemoglobin drop was (8.5 ± 4.4) g/L and no one needed blood transfusion.For ESWL,the stone-free rate were 31.8% (7/22) after first session and 86.3% (19/22) after second session for 11 infants (50.0%).Mean hospital stay was (6.6 ± 2.3) d and 10 cases (45.5%)had complications.Hemoglobin drop was (10.6 ± 12.7) g/L.MPCNL was lower than ESWL in complications rate and re-treatment rate,and the stone-free rate was higher,but the hospital stay and operation time was longer (P < 0.05).GFR revealed improve or stable after operation in both groups.Conclusions For a higher success rate,lower complication rate and re-treatment rate,MPCNL was an effective option for the management of relatively larger stones in children (even in infants).
What problem does this paper attempt to address?