Comparison of the effects between continuous veno-venous hemofiltration and hemodialysis on patients with uremic encephalopathy

Chen Liqun,Gan Hua,Li Zhengrong
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1671-8348.2011.31.012
2011-01-01
Abstract:Objective To compare the therapeutic efficiency between veno-venous hemofiltration(CVVH) and hemodialysis(HD) on patients with uremic encephalopathy.Methods Employed 45 patients of chronic renal failure with uremic encephalopathy,33 received CVVH therapy,12 received HD therapy.In all patients,the curative effect,mean artery pressure(MAP),heart rates,serum electrolyte levels,serum beta 2-mciroglobulin(β2-MG)level,HCO3-level,renal function,plasma osmotic pressure,pH value and APACHEⅡ score were observed before and after therapy.Results Before therapy,the change of heart rates,mean artery pressure,pH value,β2-MG and osmotic pressure were not significant difference between CVVH and HD group(P>0.05).After therapy,the curative effect of CVVH group was better then that of HD group(P<0.05).Compared with before therapy,serum electrolyte level,MAP,heart rates,renal function,pH value and HCO3-level were obvious difference in CVVH group after therapy.However,compared with before therapy,serum electrolyte level,MAP,heart rates,renal function,pH value and HCO3-level were obvious difference in HD group after therapy.After therapy,serum β2-MG level and APACHEⅡ score in CVVH group had significant difference between CVVH and HD group(P<0.05).Conclusion CVVH therapy can remove stably uremia toxin,correct turbulence of acid-alkali and electrolyte.CVVH therapy is a more effective measure for patients with uremic encephalopathy than HD.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?