COMPARATIVE STUDY OF SOLUTES CLEARANCES BETWEEN VARIOUS CONTINUOUS RENAL REPLACEMENT THERAPY METHODS

GONG Dehua,JI Daxi,XIE Honglang,XU Bin,LIU Yun,LI Leishi
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1006-298x.2000.06.007
2000-01-01
Abstract:To evaluate the solute clearance of three modes of continuous renal replacement therapy(CRRT) at various flow rates of dialysate and ultrafiltrate. METHODOLOGY Five patients with acute renal failure who were indicated for CRRT were enrolled in this study . A PRISMA pre dilution system with Multiflow 100 filter was applied .Solute clearance of urea nitrogen (UN) ,creatinine (Cr), uric acid( Ua), phosphate (P) and β 2 microglobulin (β 2 M) were determined at various dialysate and ultrafiltrate during CVVH(continuous venovenous hemofiltration), CVVHD(continuous venovenous hemodialysis), CVVHDF (continuous venovenous hemodiafiltration). RESULTS The determined clearance of various solutes (Kd) were calculated by the concentration of the cleared solutes in effluents (E) based on the formula Kd=(E×Q E)/P, where Q E for the flow rate of the effluent and P for the plasma concentration of the solute.Clearances of UN,Cr,Ua and P during CVVHD were greater than those during CVVH,but clearance of β 2 M during CVVHD was less than that during CVVH.The interaction between convection and diffusion was found during CVVHDF. CONCLUSION Clearance of small solutes is better in CVVHD than in CVVH,but clearance of β 2 M is better in CVVH than in CVVHD.In CVVHDF,interaction exists between diffusion and convection.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?