Chinese Kinship Semantic Structure and Annotation Scheme
Yufang Qian,Scott Songlin Piao
2007-01-01
Abstract:One of the most fruitful approaches to the study of meaning is to regard it as conceptual in nature (Cruse, 2004: Chapter 7). Cruse argues that “concepts are vital to the efficient functioning of human cognition”. We need to organize the words carrying complex meanings into certain conceptual structure in order to efficiently access it. Such an approach also provides a practical way of constructing semantic lexicons, which in turn, can be used for annotating semantic information in corpora. One of the major semantic lexicon annotation schemes in existence is the Lancaster USAS Semantic taxonomy, which has been used for constructing semantic lexicons for semantic taggers for English, Finnish and Russian (Wilson and Rayson, 1993, Rayson et al., 2004; Piao et al., 2005; Lofburg et al, 2005; Serge et al., 2006). Since the semantic scheme has been successfully ported from English to the other two languages, it can possibly be ported to other languages. However, it is not straightforward to port a semantic annotation scheme between different languages. In two previous projects (BENEDICT and ASSIST carried out at Lancaster), where the annotation scheme was applied to Finnish and Russian, it was found that different languages may have discrepancies between their semantic conceptual structures due to the diversity of cultures. Such cultural difference occurs between Chinese and English as well. A typical example of such differences is the kinship semantic structure between Chinese and English languages. Over the entire Chinese history, family has been in the central place in people’s lives. It is linguistically manifested by the finely grained semantic structure of kinship terms, a distinct feature compared to English counterparts. In Chinese language, on the one hand, there are two sets of titles for addressing corresponding relatives derived from the mother and father sides, or affinal relationship, which reflect relatives’ precise positions in a family structure, e.g. tang ge vs. biao ge. Here tang ge refers to an elder male cousin of paternal side while biao ge means an elder male cousin of maternal side. In English, on the other hand, these two sets of titles are generally merged together into a single set, only reflecting the hierarchy of generation and gender. Sometimes even the gender is ignored. For example, the (first) cousin corresponding to both tang ge and biao jie (elder female cousin of maternal side) in