Abstract:BACKGROUND:Medical malpractice litigations affect the practices of patient safety. However, medical malpractice litigations involve highly specialized knowledge. Thus, medical appraisal is usually essential in the ascertainment of responsibility and judicial decision-making. China's judicial system is characterized by a dual-mode of medical appraisal resulting from two parallel appraisal agencies: judicial appraisal institutions and medical associations. This paper examines whether or not and how choices of different medical appraisal agencies affect malpractice lawsuit results in China.METHODS:We collected and sampled a total of 2557 verdicts pertaining to medical disputes from "China Judgements Online" in 2014. We used an ordinary least square regression model and a mediating effect regression model to analyze to what extent and how different choices between two medical appraisal agencies affect malpractice litigations.RESULTS:(1) Almost 81.55% (2082) of litigants resorted to medical malpractice appraisals in China in 2014. Among 2070 cases with appraisal results accepted by the court, 60.10% of the litigants chose judicial appraisal institutions (1244), as opposed to medical associations (826). (2) Among 2557 cases, 2306 (90.18%) claimed compensation and 1919 (83.22%) were awarded compensation by the courts. The proportion of compensation paid in a case is 48% on average. (3) Appraisal agencies matter in the investigation of medical errors, which in turn affects the proportion of compensation paid in a case. (4) Choosing judicial appraisal institutions will raise the proportion of compensation paid by about 10% on average.CONCLUSIONS:Different choices between appraisal institutions affect malpractice litigations in China. As the last resort for remedying medical malpractice, medical appraisals in the judicial system could be a source of inequality in China's medical litigation outcomes.

The Discussion of Administrative Judgement for Settlements of Malpractices

On Administrative Litigation's Performing Legal Duty Judgment

Comparative Study on the Treatments of Medical Disputes Between Medical Staff and Patients

The Boundary of “Collecting Mistakes Whenever Discovered”

Reflection on Administrative Litigation System under the Concept of "people Oriented"

Solution of Disputes and Supervision of Powers: Dispute Solution in Laws Applying to Actions Against Administrative Agencies' Decisions

Ways and methods of medical social work in settling medical dispute

Survey and Analysis on Consultation Settlement of 124 Doctor-Patient Disputes in 37 Medical Institutes in Shangha

Discussion of Alternative Dispute Resolution to resolve medical disputes

Mode and Intervention Ways to Dispose Medical ]Disputes

Discussion on Administrative Accountability on the Medical Side in Medical Damage Cases

Cognition and attitude on medical dispute and its management among medical staffs and outpatients

Application of the People’s Mediation in a Hospital in Shanghai

Analysis on rationality and legitimacy of medical dispute legal remedy in public hospital by some oneself

A Practical Analysis on the Legal Regulation of Medical Malpractice

Analysis on the Types of Administrative Litigation——Taking the Administrative Trials in Zhangzhou As an Example

The Discussion of Administrative Case Trialing off-site

Survey Analysis of Consultation Settlement for Medical Disputes in 30 Medical Institutions of Shanghai

Causes and countermeasures of medical dispute in view of patients

Inequality in the Last Resort: How Medical Appraisal Affects Malpractice Litigations in China

Prevention and Mediation of Medical Disputes In the New Era