Book Review: Elisabeth CROLL, China's New Consumers: Social Development and Domestic Demand. London and New York: Routledge, 2006. Xv + 366 Pp. ISBN: 0-415-41123-3 (hc). Price: £75.00

Deborah Davis
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0920203x080220010605
2008-01-01
China Information
Abstract:South Koreans hold against Japan to this day, according to Chung, the process of the Sino–South Korean normalization was special, and this special character was based on cultural bonds rather than on strategic calculations, economic considerations, or diplomatic maneuvers. The Cold War divided both China and Korea, creating two sets of relationships: the South Korea–Taiwan and North Korea–China alliances. Chung compares the manner in which Beijing and Seoul sought cooperation with each other at the expense of their longtime partners Pyongyang and Taipei. He concludes that in the process of improving relations Beijing showed more sensitivity to the reactions and feelings of North Korea than Seoul to Taiwan. Because of the unavailability of primary documents, Chung’s discussion of the decision-making process of the Sino–South Korean rapprochement is at times spotty and tentative. Some of his assertions are not supported by documents. For instance, he suggests that the Korean War veterans in China might have played a key role in blocking the progress of improving relations with South Korea, but he produces no evidence to support his suggestion. Liu Yazhou, a People’s Liberation Army officer, was included in the Small Group on South Korea, not because the civilian leadership wanted to make a gesture toward the military establishment but because Liu had been associated with a company that had economic ties with South Korea. In the Chinese political system, the Party dominates the military, and when the Party issues an order, the military follows. In sum, Chung’s book makes an important contribution to the study of Sino–South Korean relations in particular and the international relations in East Asia in general. It is well researched and clearly written. QIANG ZHAI, History, Auburn University Montgomery, Alabama, USA
What problem does this paper attempt to address?