Unarticulated Constituents:Myth or Reality?

Longgen LIU
DOI: https://doi.org/10.13564/j.cnki.issn.1672-9382.2011.02.007
2011-01-01
Abstract:Over the ontological status,characteristics and functions of the so-called unarticulated constituents,the debates substantially reflect the different stands contextualism and semantic minimalism take on such a range of topics in the philosophy of language as meaning,proposition,truth-conditions and even the semantics/pragmatics interface.Currently,various forms of contextualism have become the dominant orientation in the philosophy of language,and the formal study of sentence meaning and the relatively informal study of the properties of speech acts have become more and more intertwined,thus promoting the shift of the focus of study from sentences to utterances.Consequently,the explanatory power of pragmatic enrichment has been increasingly manifested.Therefore,the notion of unarticulated constituents seems unlikely to withdraw from the arena of the philosophy of language in the foreseeable future.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?