Abstract:The prevailing view on meaning in logical semantics from its inception at the end of the nineteenth century until the beginning of the eighties has been one which is aptly summarized in the slogan ‘meaning equals truth conditions’. This view on meaning is one which can rightly be labeled static: it describes the meaning relation between linguistic expressions and the world as a static relation, one which may itself change through time, but which does not bring about any change itself. For non-sentential expressions (nouns, verbs, modifiers, etc.) the same goes through: in accordance with the principle of compositionality of meaning, their meaning resides in their contribution to the truth-conditions of the sentences in which they occur. In most cases this contribution consists in what they denote (refer to), hence the slogan can be extended to ‘meaning equals denotation conditions’. Of course, although this view on meaning was the prevailing one for almost a century, many of the people who initiated the enterprise of logical semantics, including people like Frege and Wittgenstein, had an open eye for all that it did not catch. However, the logical means which Frege, Wittgenstein, Russell, and the generation that succeeded them, had at their disposal were those of classical mathematical logic and set-theory, and these indeed are not very suited for an analysis of other aspects of meaning than those which the slogan covers. A real change in view then had to await the emergence of other concepts, which in due course became available mainly under the influence of developments in computer science and cognate disciplines such as artificial intelligence. And this is one of the reasons why it took almost a century before any serious and successful challenge of the view that meaning equals truthconditions from within logical semantics could emerge. The static view on meaning was, of course, already challenged from the outside, but in most cases such attacks started from premises which are quite alien to the logical semantics enterprise as such, and hence failed to bring about any radical changes. An important development has been that of speech act theory, originating from the work of Austin, and worked out systematically by Searle and

SPEECH ACTS, VERBS AND THE PARADIGMATIC VS. SYNTAGMATIC MEANING REVISITED

The Semantics, Pragmatics and Translation of Speech Acts

The development of the analytical philosophy of language from the problem of meaning to the theory of speech acts

Coreference and Modality

Relevance Theory, Semantic Content and Pragmatic Enrichment

The relevance theory, pragmatics and the problem of meaning

Ideational semiosis: a tri-stratal perspective on grammatical metaphor

Pragmatic complexity in metaphor interpretation

Thoughts and Utterances: The Pragmatics of Explicit Communication

Pragmemes revisited. A theoretical framework

Language Heedless of Logic - Philosophy Mindful of What? Failures of Distributive and Absorption Laws

Bridging the Chasm Between Cognitive Representations and Formal Structures of Linguistic Meanings

The Interdependence Between Generative Syntax and Pragmatics:An Initial and Tentative Exploration

On the Formal Semantics of Speech-Act Based Communication in an Agent-Oriented Programming Language

A Paradigm Change for Formal Syntax: Computational Algorithms in the Grammar of English

The relevance of words and the language/communication divide

Spatial Properties of ACTION Verb Semantics: Experimental Evidence for Image Schema Orientation in Transitive vs. Reciprocal Verbs and Its Implications for Ideology

Embodied Metarepresentations

Artificial Intelligence and Semantics through the Prism of Structural, Post-Structural and Transcendental Approaches

The Role of Image Schemas in Interpreting English Phrasal Verbs: A Philosophical and Linguistic Perspective

Speakers’ Gestures and Semantic Analysis