Abstract:Frege’s logic, which denies the factors of mankind and his mind, is just suitable in some fields, e.g. in deduction, but not in induction, of mathematics. We would be wrong if we extended his truth to other fields, for example, daily life or philosophy. Something like the factors of mankind and mental elements that Frege gave up is just the starting point of new revolution in logic and philosophy. After Frege, logicians and philosophers returned to the natural language in the middle of the 20~ th century. J. L.Austin (1955) found some kinds of utterances, performatives that are of doing something in saying something, which are meaningful but not true or false. Then, he created his famous theory of speech acts, which is the foundational theory of pragmatics that gives consideration to man, the user of language. N.Chomsky (1957) developed his syntactic theory in rationalism and psychologism, which takes Language Faculty (LF) as innate, viewing language as the mirror of mind. After these developments, a new inter-discipline, cognitive science, was set up in the mid 1970s. Therefore, this author thinks that it would be necessary to institute a new frame of logic in the background of cognitive science, say, cognitive logic. The author got the cognitive logic system made up of six disciplines-philosophical logic, mental logic, logic of language, logics in culture and evolution, logics in AI, and logic of neuro-web-by mapping six branches of cognitive science into the fields of modern logic. The author points out that some new fields of cognitive logic, such as mental logic and logic in culture and evolution should be paid more attention to. In this paper, the different characteristics of mental logic and Frege’s logic are analyzed in detail. Mental logic is a new discipline integrating logic with psychology, in which the mentation that Frege had forsaken came back again into logic. The author points out that logic faculty, like language faculty, is also innate. Therefore, logic must have some certain structures and modalities that are genetic, innate and mental. Finally, the author concludes that logic cannot function in exploring man's mind in cognitive science until it has returned to mankind himself.

On the Informal Logic and Its Basic Feature

On Non-formal Logic:Its Objects and Future Directions

Problems of Inconsistency and Argumentation Logics

On Argument Evaluation from A Perspective of Informal Logic

Development of Children's Informal Mathematics in China

Logic:A Growing and Changing Concept

Interatomic potentials for atomistic simulations of the Ti-Al system

Informal Learning and Its Environment Model Construction under the Background of Collective Intelligence

Toward a Hierarchal "View of Logic in Broad Sense"——Retrospection and Reflection of the Two Major Disputes on "View of Logic"

On Teaching Thinking of Law Logics

The Analysis of the Nature of Form and Its Original Relations with Western Thought

On the Logic of Education Practice

Abstraction Logic: A New Foundation for (Computer) Mathematics

Logic and Natural Language

On“Grammatical Logic”in Systemic-Functional Linguistics

The Informal Logic Model of Argumentation and Evaluation and Its Limitations

On Interdisciplinary Studies of a New Generation of Artificial Intelligence and Logic

Logic, Mind and Cognition——On the Development of Logic in the post-Frege Time

Logic Across the University: Foundations and Applications

Present and Future of Formal Argumentation (dagstuhl Perspectives Workshop 15362).

On Critical thinking and Logic