The Informal Logic Model of Argumentation and Evaluation and Its Limitations

Xiong Minghui

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1000-7326.2007.09.011

2007-01-01

Abstract:There are two types of argument: one is the argument as product and another as process. Habermas called the former'argument' and the latter'argumentation'. In the first half of the 20th century, however, the structures of argument had mainly been idealized, so mathematical proofs had been taken as a paradigm of successful argument. Arguments were entirely abstracted away from the context of natural language. Beginning in 1940s, as a matter of fact, philosophers such as Strawson, Austin, Searle et al focused on the pragmatic elements in assessing arguments. It is a pity that their works had little developed on the formal semantics by Richard Montague and his followers. The aim of argument evaluation model based on informal logic is alleged to assess a real argument in everyday life, but an argument is treated as a product rather than a process. Therefore, informal logical model is not successful while evaluating a real argument.