Abstract:PurposeThe effect of board intellectual capital on non-profit organizational performance in non-western, less developed economies has been an important yet under-researched area. Given that the institutional and business relationships of a board account for the majority of board intellectual capital, the purpose of this paper is to fill the previously mentioned research gap by addressing how the interactions of the two relationships of board directors influence Chinese philanthropic foundation performance.Design/methodology/approachFollowing Creswell's (2014) explanatory sequential mixed-methodology, a qualitative study (Study 1) was first conducted to pre-test the assumptions, and then a quantitative study (Study 2) was carried out based on a secondary database of 1,405 Chinese philanthropic foundations to further examine the hypotheses. Several regression models were built for analyzing the results.FindingsStudy 1 confirmed that Chinese philanthropic foundations gained greater revenues and hosted more public welfare activities by leveraging the reinforcing or complementary effects of board directors' intellectual capital to improve organizational performance. Study 2 further examined the hypotheses that the interactions of intellectual capital increased the total revenue and public welfare expenditure of the foundations; however, significant positive relationships were only identified in foundations at the local level, and no significant associations were found in those at the national level.Practical implicationsThe research indicates that the intellectual capital of board directors may influence the performance of their philanthropic foundations. Thus, Chinese philanthropic foundations should be more aware of the importance of this influence when determining which candidates will join the board.Originality/valueThe study makes significant contributions to the existing knowledge of the development of non-governmental organizations; it incorporates the resource dependence theory and agency theory into understanding how the intricate interactions between the institutional and business relationships of board directors affect foundation performance and how the jurisdiction affiliations act as a boundary condition for such relationships in a non-western setting such as China.

Board Network:Definition,Characteristics and Measurement

A Review on Board Network and its Governance Role

Board Network,Governance Role of Independent Directors and Executive Incentives

Identifying Board of Director Network Influence for Firm Characteristics

How Board Faultlines Affect Board Effectiveness in Monitoring

The Influence of Board Directors' Institutional and Business Relationships on Philanthropic Foundation Performance

Interlocking Directorate and Firm’s Diversification Strategy: Perspective of Strategy Learning

Board Network,Firm Centrality and Investment Efficiency

Board of directors network centrality and environmental, social and governance (ESG) performance

Corporate Board Network Ties and Corporate Social Performance Alignment

Network Centrality and Dissent Voting by Directors on Boards

The Swiss Board Directors Network in 2009

Bank shareholder network and board governance: Evidence from Chinese commercial banks

The Causes of Interlocking Directorates in China from the Network Perspective——An Empirical Study Based on Shanghai and Guangdong

Impact of Directors’ Network on Corporate Social Responsibility Disclosure: Evidence from China

Board Network and Accounting Policies’ Convergence:Evidence Based on Implicit Decision of Development Cost in China

Measure Of Layer Centrality In Multilayer Network

Centrality in the Global Network of Corporate Control

Is Being Connected to Leaders Always Beneficial? Instrumental Interaction and the Development of Social Capital Within Organisational Networks

Boardroom networks and corporate investment

Board Interlock Networks and the Use of Relative Performance Evaluation