Abstract:We try to explore the relation among three factors: the private benefits that main shareholders can obtain from the firm, the social benefits derived from a certain ownership structure and the ownership concentration costs. Different corporations have different optimal governance mechanism. Noticing the substitute relation between the level of the management-and-shareholder-conflicts and the different governance mechanism, we take use of the data from China’ stock market and conduct an empirical analysis on the influence both of the different shareholder’s participating in governance and the ownership structure over corporate performance, and have reached two conclusions. First, in the companies with a higher level of conflicts between the management and the shareholders, the shareholder will be more active in participating in governance because the benefits earned here is much more than the company with a lower level of conflicts. Second, when the other governance mechanisms in one company perform poorly, the shareholder is less active in participating in governance because the extra benefits earned here cannot offset their costs. So only in these companies with poor governance mechanisms, the shareholders’ active monitoring can produce benefits. These conclusions can help our further research on the relationship among the shareholder supervision, ownership structure and corporate value, and we should also re-evaluate some traditional theoretical viewpoints

Bank shareholder network and board governance: Evidence from Chinese commercial banks

Does the Shareholding Network Affect Bank's Risk-Taking Behavior? an Exploratory Study on Chinese Commercial Banks

Corporate Governance and Systemic Risk: Evidence from Chinese-listed Banks

A Review on Board Network and its Governance Role

Empirical Analysis on Validity of Chinese Commercial Bank Governance

Does Bank Governance Affect the Bank Lending Channel of Monetary Policy?—Evidence from the Chinese Commercial Banks

Empirical Analysis on the Relationship between Board Governance and Performance of China's Listed Banks

Corporate Governance And Risk Management Of Bank: Evidence From China

Corporate governance and capital market risk: New evidence from firm-specific measures among Chinese listed companies

Does Bank Ownership Increase Firm Value? Evidence from China

On the Corporate Governance Effect of Bank's Credit

Director Network, Governance of Independent Directors and Efficiency of Enterprise Capital Allocation

Political Shareholders,Bank Governance and Risk-taking of Small&Medium Commercial Banks:Empirical Evidence from Shandong and Henan Provinces

The impact of financial institutions' cross-shareholdings on risk-taking

An Empirical Study on the Relationship Between Director Board's Characteristics and Bank Performance——Evidence from China's 14 Listed Banks

Independent Directors’ Board Networks and Controlling Shareholders’ Tunneling Behavior

The Influence of Private Large Shareholders on the Distribution of Bank Loan Industry: Evidence from China

Ownership Structure,Bank Lending and Financial Performance:Evidence Based on the City Commercial Bank in China

Empirical Study on the Evaluation of the Board Governance of China's Listed Companies

Private Interest and Social Interest of Shareholders: Empirical Evidence from China

Does Social Network Improve Corporate Financing Efficiency? Evidence from China