Experimental study on drop formation in liquid–liquid fluidized bed

Zhengbiao Peng,Zhulin Yuan,Xuan Wu,Jie Cai,Fengxian Fan,Li Tie,Geng Fan,Chen Pan,Kunfeng Liang

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ces.2008.11.012

IF: 4.7

2009-01-01

Chemical Engineering Science

Abstract:Drop formation in liquid–liquid fluidized bed was investigated experimentally. The normal water was injected via a fine-capillary spray nozzle into the co-flowing No. 25 transformer oil with jet directed upwards in a vertical fluidized bed. Experiments under a wide variety of conditions were conducted to investigate the instability dynamics of the jet, the size and size distribution of the drops. Details of drop formation, drop flow patterns and jet evolution were monitored in real-time by an ultra-high-speed digital CCD (charge couple device) camera. The Rosin–Rammler model was applied to characterize experimental drop size distributions. Final results demonstrate that drop formation in liquid–liquid system takes place on three absolutely different developing regimes: bubbling, laminar jetting and turbulent jetting, depending on the relative Reynolds number between the two phases. For different flow domains, dynamics of drop formation change significantly, involving mechanism of jet breakup, jet length pulsation, mean size and uniformity of the drops. The jet length fluctuates with time in variable and random amplitudes for a specified set of operated parameters. Good agreement is shown between the drop size and the Rosin–Rammler distribution function with the minimum correlation coefficient 0.9199. The mean drop diameter decreases all along with increasing jet flow rate. Especially after the relative Reynolds number exceeds a certain value about 3.5×104, the jet disrupts intensely into multiple small drops with a diameter mainly ranging from 1.0 to 1.5mm and a more and more uniform size distribution. The turbulent jetting regime of drop formation is the most preferable to the dynamic ice slurry making system.