Contrast study the effects of surgical approaches on repairing cleft palate

QIN Rui-feng,FENG Xing-hua,WU Wei
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1673-7040.2005.06.008
2005-01-01
Abstract:Objective To contrast study the results of both palatorrhaphy only and simultaneous palatorrhaphy and posterior pharyngeal flap transplantaion in unoperated cleft patients over eight years. Methods Twenty-four cleft palate patients over eight years were repaired by palatorrhaphy and posterior pharyngeal flap transplantation, and twelve were only repaired by palatorrhaphy only. We evaluated the postoperative effects of the operation by analysing the acoustic features and the velopharyngeal function of all the patients. Results All the operation were successful, and the wound healed well. The pronunciation of all the patients after operation impoved much than before. By comparing two groups, palatorrhaphy and posterior pharyngeal flap transplantation for repairing complete cleft palate is better than the palatorrhaphy only. Conclusion Comparing with palatorrhaphy only, the palatorrhaphy and posterior pharyngeal flap transplantation for repairing complete cleft palate patients over eight years is good method for improving velopharyngeal function and pronunciation.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?