Clinical comparative study of two kinds of methods in surgical repair of isolated clefts

Xin ZHAN,Zhi-qing YAO,Yong LU,Zhi-yong WANG
DOI: https://doi.org/10.15909/j.cnki.cn61-1347/r.2014.14.039
2014-01-01
Abstract:Objective To compare the clinical effect of Sommerlad versus Von Langenbeck technique repair of isolated clefts. Methods A consecutive series of 143 children born with isolated cleft palate between 2005 and 2011.Experimental group: 54 cleft patients received palatopltsty with levator veli palatini retropositioning according to Sommerlad(ranged from 1 to 6 years, mean age 2.6 years).Control group: 89 cleft patients received Von Langenbeck technique(ranged from 1 to 8 years,mean age 3.2 years).From medical records,the variables of blood loss,diet,temperature changes,wound healing,bleeding and postoperative perforation were observed and analyzed. Results In experimental group,one case of postoperative infection was found in all cases,5 patients had fever,and 1 patients developed bleeding.There were 4 patients with postoperative infection,21 patients with fever and 3patients developed bleeding in control group. There was significant difference in the two groups(P0.05).Postoperative cleft perforation occurred in 3 patients of experimental group, and 4 patients of control group(P0.05). Blood loss was higher using the Von Langenbeck technique(34.2m vs 18.6m,P 0.01). Conclusion The cleft palate repair technique according to Sommerlad in this study has been shown to result in less hurt and good postoperative recovery.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?