Evaluation of fistula rates in three cleft palate techniques without relaxing incisions

Yuanyuan Li,Min Wu,Chao Yang,Chialing Tsauo,Chen Li,Renkai Liu,Qian Zheng,Bing Shi,David W Low,Cheng-Hao Li,David W. Low,Cheng-hao Li

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcms.2021.01.022

2021-06-01

Abstract:<p>The aim of the present study was to investigate the incidence of postoperative fistula formation from a hybrid cleft palate repair compared to that from two well-established techniques.</p><p>We performed a modified technique, Sommerlad-Furlow (SF), which combined the repositioning of the levator veli palatini muscles as described by Sommerlad with the double opposing Z-plasty of Furlow to lengthen the soft palate. A retrospective cohort study was conducted to evaluate patients who underwent cleft palate repair utilizing SF, Sommerlad, or Furlow techniques with the incidence of palatal fistula as the target endpoint.</p><p>A total of 1,164 patients were included in the present study and underwent the following techniques: 603 cases with SF, 244 cases with Furlow, and 317 cases with Sommerlad. In addition to not requiring relaxing incisions, SF advantages included a consistently lower fistula rate compared to that of the Sommerlad technique, as well as the lowest fistula rate in patients with both hard and soft palate clefts without a cleft lip (OR:2.62 95% CI: 1.35, 5.09). However, the differences among the three techniques did not reach statistical significance in terms of a bilateral or unilateral cleft lip/palate, or in patients with a soft palate only or a submucosal cleft palate(OR: 2.22,95% CI:0.77, 6.37).</p><p>Based on the results of our study, the Somerlad-Furlow technique should be preferred whenever possible.</p>

dentistry, oral surgery & medicine,surgery