Abstract:The debate on the methodology of constitutional jurisprudence has become much hotter than ever for recent years. The dilemma how the constitutional theories should react to the political realities yields the significant controversy between the political constitutionalism and the normative constitutionalism, which is grounded on the dichotomy of fact and norm. However, either political constitutionalism or normative constitutionalism is insupportable in context of methodology. The political constitutionalism is near to the sociology of law, both of which try to reflect the positive law through inquiring into the social or political realities. However, they seem to be lost in the chains of causation, take the factual interests and purposes as the standards of evaluation and tend to ignore the normativity and legitimacy. Thus it overemphasizes the importance of the unwritten constitution, the policies and the interests at the price of the authority and stability of the constitution. The normative constitutionalism sets its foundation on the positive constitution while has not so much ideas of the sources of its legitimacy and validity. Neither offers it an answer to the question of the philosophical foundation of the constitution as a value—related law. This also affects the concretizing and interpretation of the constitution. As a science of "understanding", the constitutional jurisprudence is neither a pure and strictly logical theory of values nor a pure positive theory or sociology of fact description. The values in the constitution derive from the integration of facts and norms and the integration of the constitutional norms and the realities, and reflect the spirits of our times. To integrate the normative meaning of the constitution and the ever changing realities through the integrative constitutional interpretation is the main issue for modern constitutional jurisprudence.

A Reflection on the History of Chinese Constitutionalism of Last Century

Reflections on the Century- Old Constitutional Government in China

An Historical Perspective on the Constitution of Contemporary Chinese Political Culture

Focus:Constitution Legislation at Late Qing Dynasty and Rethinking of China's Route toward Constitutionalism The Losses in "Traditional" Chinese Constitutionalism Development

The Irony in the Lineage of Modern Chinese Constitutions and Constitutionalism

How Do Chinese Judges Invoke the Constitution? Analysis Based on 1907 Decisions

The Reflections on Constitutional Culture and Construction of System in China

A Debate on the Probability of Constitutional Government in Modem China

A Constitution Without Constitutionalism? the Paths of Constitutional Development in China

On Constitutional Politics

Conflict between Constitutional Monarchy and Republics and Its Impact on Modern China's Constitutionalism Development

A Reflection on Democracy and Constitutionalism

Reflection on the Methodology of Chinese Constitutional Jurisprudence

Reflection on the Chinese Legal Tradition

The Constitutional Consciousness of Chinese Citizens over 60 Years of Social Change

Introduction to "constitutionalism, Reform, and the Nature of the Chinese State: Dialogues among Western and Chinese Scholars, Iii"

Transformation of constitution and predicament of constitutionalism in the view of China's century of constitutionalism

On the Change of China's Legislative Mode from the Perspective of Constitutionalism

The Present Development of China's Constitutionalism and the Improvement of Citizens

Legal Cornerstone of Social Transformation in China:the historical status of the Constitution 1982

Probe into the Basic Path to China's Constitutionalism