The Comparative Study on Clinical Effects of Different Nephron-Sparing Surgical Methods for Localized Renal Carcinoma

霍立志,井汉国,史本康,石汝骥,王腾春,程镇,马天加
DOI: https://doi.org/10.13499/j.cnki.fqjwkzz.2011.09.019
2011-01-01
Abstract:Objective:To compare the clinical effect of three different nephron-sparing surgical methods including peritoneal laparoscopy,retroperitoneal laparoscopy and open surgery for localized renal carcinoma.Methods:The clinical data of 67 patients with localized renal carcinoma was retrospectively analyzed.According to the methods of operation,they were divided into three groups,group A∶ 22 patients underwent peritoneal laparoscopic excision,group B∶ 21 patients underwent retroperitoneal laparoscopic excision and group C∶ 24 patients underwent open surgery.The operating time,renal warm ischemia time,blood loss,hospital stay,postoperative recurrence and metastasis were compared among the three groups and were statistically analyzed.Results:All of the operations were successful.63 specimens were proved clear cell carcinoma and 4 specimens were proved granular cell carcinoma by pathology examination.All of them were in renal capsule and the margin tissues were negative.The operation time of group A,group B and group C were(118.7±27.9) min,(110.8±26.5) min and(106.4±25.5) min respectively.There was no statistically significant difference in them(P0.05).Renal warm ischemia time were(24.2±13.1) min,(23.6±12.9) min and(14.2±4.5) min respectively.The volumes of blood loss were(125.4±42.0) ml,(116.5±37.3) ml and(254.6±128.5) ml respectively.The time of hospital stay were(11.2±3.0) d,(10.1±1.8) d and(16.2±3.2) d respectively.There was statistically significant difference in group C vs group A and group B in the three terms above(P0.05) and there was no statistically significant difference between group A and group B(P0.05).All of the patients were followed up 8 to 60 months,1 case of tumor local recurrence in group B and 1 case of solitary pulmonary metastasis in group C were found.They were cured by re-operation.There was no statistically significant difference among the three groups(P0.0167).Conclusions:Peritoneal laparoscopic and retroperitoneal laparoscopic nephron-sparing surgery for localized renal carcinoma have the advantages of minimal invasion,quick recovery and equal clinical effect with open surgery,and can substitute for open surgery.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?