Abstract:Objective To compare the clinical results between minimally invasive percutaneous transforaminal endoscopic discectomy(PELD) and microsurgical lumbar discectomy(MSLD) for lumbar disc herniation(LDH). Methods From June 2013 to December 2014, 256 patients with LDH in the Affiliated Provincial Hospital of Anhui Medical University underwent discectomy were enrolled in the research. One hundred and thirty-two patients were treated with MSLD and 124 cases with the PELD. The following measuring instruments were used: Visual analog scale for pain, the Oswestry Disability Index for patients′function and modified MacNab method for clinical outcome. The perioperative index, relief of the low back and leg pain, and clinical evaluation of each group were documented and compared respectively. Results All patients had been followed up for 5 to 35 months, averaged (20. 3 ± 4. 8) months and (19. 5 ± 5. 0) months in the MSLD group and PELD group, respectively. Overall, the PELD group had shorter surgical incision, shorter hospital stay and faster return to work than the MSLD group; however, operating time and radiation exposure were more than MSLD (all P values < 0. 01). The postoperative ODI and VAS score were significantly improved compared with preoperative ones in 2 groups (all P values < 0. 05); the VAS of back and leg pain in MSLD group were significantly better than those in the PELD group at 1 and 3 months (all P values < 0. 01), but no significant difference was found at 6 months and last follow-up (P > 0. 05). There was no significant difference in the main clinical outcome criteria ODI between the PELD and the MSLD group. According to the modified MacNab criteria, the excellent and good rates were 94. 7% (125 / 132)and 94. 3% (117 / 124) in the MSLD and PELD groups in the latest follow-up, respectively, and the differences between the 2 groups were not statistically significant (χ2 = 0. 015, P > 0. 05). There was no incidence of greater artery injury in each group. In MSLD group, there were 2 patients with nerve root traction injury, 1 patient with dural tear. In PELD group, there were 5 patients with postoperative dysesthesia of exiting root, 1 patient with neck pain during operation, and remnant disc fragment was found in one patient with highly migrated disc herniation. There were 2 patients of recurrence with disc herniations in each group, and were all treated with minimally invasive transforaminal lumber iterbody fusion. Conclusions Both PELD and MSLD are effective treatments for patients with LDH, and can get satisfactory clinical results. PELD have some advantages of less trauma, less pain, less duration of hospital stay, local anesthesia and early function recovery. However, it needs more radiation exposure and operation time, and it is difficult in some special patients (such as large, calcified and highly migrated disc herniations), PELD may be helpful for these patients.

Comparative study of clinical effect between microendoscopic discectomy and microsurgical lumbar discectomy for lumbar disc herniations

Clinical application of microendoscopic discectomy for the treatment of lumbar disc herniation

Comparison of Outcomes Between Tubular Microdiscectomy and Conventional Microdiscectomy for Lumbar Disc Herniation: a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

Comparison of Discectomy Versus Sequestrectomy in Lumbar Disc Herniation: a Meta-Analysis of Comparative Studies.

Retrospective Analysis of Clinical Effects Between Traditional Open Discectomy and Microendoscopy (MED) for Lumbar Disc Herniation

Comparison of mid-term effects between microendoscopic discectomy and microsurgical lumbar discectomy for operatively treating lumbar disc herniation

Comparative study on lumbar microsurgery lumbar discectomy and traditional open discectomy for the treatment of lumbar disc herniation

Comparative Study of Microendoscopic Disecetomy and Fenestration Discectomy for Mono-Segment Lumbar Disc Herniation

Comparison of microendoscopic discectomy and open discectomy for single-segment lumbar disc herniation

Comparison of minimally invasive percutaneous transforaminal endoscopic discectomy and microsurgical lumbar discectomy for lumbar disc herniation

Minial Invasival Study and Clinical Application of Lumbar Discectomy Via Percutaneous Endoscopic Approach vs on ;Lumber Disk Herniation

Operative treatmeat of the lumbar disc herniation with microendoscopic discectomy

Analysis of Reoperation Causes of Microinvasive Endoscopic Discectomy and That of Open Discectomy for the Treatment of Lumbar Disc Herniation

Comparison of the effectiveness and outcome of microendoscopic and open discectomy in patients suffering from lumbar disc herniation

Operative Indication and Therapeutic Efficancy of Lumbar Disc Herniation with Microendoscopic Discectomy

Clinical Experience and Results of Lumbar Microendoscopic Discectomy: a Study with a Five‐year Follow‐up

A Study on Mid-Term Effects of Microendoscopic Discectomy for Lumbar Intervertebral Disc Herniation

Microendoscopic Discectomy, a Less Traumatic Procedure for Lumbar Disk Herniation.

Early outcomes of surgical treatment with microdiscectomy in patients with lumbar disc herniation

Surgical treatment of lumbar intervertebral disc herniation by microendoscopic discectomy through posterior approach

COMPARISON OF TWO SURGERIES IN TREATMENT OF LUMBAR DISC HEMIATION