Abstract:Nanoindentation experiments were conducted to investigate the elasticity normal to the basal plane of six non-expandable, hydrous 2:1 phyllosilicate minerals (pyrophyllite, talc, biotite, two muscovite samples, and margarite) with layer charge z ranging from 0 to 1.823 per O10(OH)2. For the examined indentation depth h of ≤200 nm, the measured Young’s modulus E decreases with increasing h. Furthermore, the rate of reduction in the apparent E, in general, decreases with increasing z. The dependence of apparent E on h is attributed to indentation-induced inelastic deformation, particularly the deformation related to the high local stresses beneath the indenter tip, such as kink band formation, layer delamination, void generation, and cracking, which tend to cause damage to the layer structure. To minimize the influence of inelastic deformation on the measurement of E by indentation, the maximum E at small h is proposed to be the truly representative elastic modulus. The stiffest species, margarite, with z = 1.823, has a representative E of 165.5 GPa, seven times greater than that of pyrophyllite with z = 0 and E = 23.5 GPa. A nearly linear correlation between the representative E and the square of the ratio of the surface charge density σ to half of the basal spacing d(001), [2σ/d(001)]2, exists. This relationship suggests that the elasticity normal to the basal plane of these phyllosilicates is primarily controlled by the long-range electrostatic attractions between the 2:1 layer and interlayer cations instead of atomic bonds within the 2:1 layer, although other compositional and structural variations also affect the interlayer interactions. This relationship may indicate that the interlayer complexes can be used as the elasticity signatures of phyllosilicate minerals.

Elastic Modulus and Hardness of Muscovite and Rectorite Determined by Nanoindentation

Reply to the Comment on “elastic Modulus and Hardness of Muscovite and Rectorite Determined by Nanoindentation” by G. Zhang, Z. Wei and R.E. Ferrell [applied Clay Science 43 (2009) 271-281]

Nanoindentation Behavior Of Muscovite Subjected To Repeated Loading

Evaluation of the Elasticity Normal to the Basal Plane of Non-Expandable 2:1 Phyllosilicate Minerals by Nanoindentation

Characterization of Elastic Modulus and Hardness of Brittle Solids by Instrumented Indentation

Anisotropy of mica probed by nanoindentation

Analysis of the nanoindentation load–displacement curves measured on high-purity fine-grained alumina

Mechanical Properties and Nanoindentation Size Effects of YAG Crystals with Different Crystal Faces

Determination of elastic moduli of polymeric materials using microhardness indentation

Hardness and Young's modulus of Al3Yb single crystal studied by nano indentation

Effect of peak load on the determination of hardness and Young's modulus of hot-pressed Si3N4 by nanoindentation

Nano-Indentation Experiments on Anisotropy of Single Crystal Cu Oriented by EBSD Technique

Relationship of Stiffness-Based Indentation Properties Using Continuous-Stiffness-Measurement Method

Effects of Interlayer Interactions on the Nanoindentation Behavior and Hardness of 2:1 Phyllosilicates

Nanohardness by Nanoindentation

On the description of indentation size effect in hardness testing for ceramics: Analysis of the nanoindentation data

On the Determination of Reduced Young's Modulus and Hardness of Elastoplastic Materials Using a Single Sharp Indenter

Extraction Of Elastic Modulus And Hardness Of The Soft Metallic Films On Hard Substrates By Nanoindentation

Role of elastic deformation in determining the mixed alkaline earth effect of hardness in silicate glasses

Relationship Between the Ratio of Young’s Modulus to Hardness and the Elastic Recovery of Nanoindentation