Abstract:Purpose With rising globalization, Western and Eastern brands are increasingly collaborating and co-branding. Drawing on the theory of dialectical self that captures the degree of cognitive tendency to tolerate conflicts, inconsistencies and ambiguities in self-concept, this paper investigates the effect of consumer dialectical self on co-branding that encompasses Western and East Asian cultural brand personality traits. Design/methodology/approach Two studies were conducted using Chinese participants to examine the effects of the dialectical self on co-brand evaluation under single-and dual-personality conditions and to explore the mediating role of ideal social self-congruence and the moderating role of product type (high vs low conspicuous). Findings The findings suggest that counterintuitive to the received wisdom, the dialectical self negatively influences one's attitude towards a co-brand in the dual-personality condition only. Further, ideal social self-congruence mediates the relationship between the dialectical self and dual-personality co-brand evaluation in the high conspicuous product condition only. Practical implications Important implications are offered to international marketing managers for managing the dialectical self that lead to positive co-brand evaluations. Moreover, managers should highlight ideal social self-congruence for co-branding success for particular product types. Originality/value This paper examines co-branding from a novel perspective of consumer dialectical self and shows the pivotal role it plays when brands carry varying cultural traits engage in co-branding. By identifying the role of the dialectical self and the important mediator and moderator, the paper fulfils an important gap in co-branding literature and offers key implications.

The Causal Relationship between Dialectical Thinking and Dialectical Emotions

Dialectical Emotions:Research Methods and Its Prospects

Dialecticism and the Co-occurrence of Positive and Negative Emotions Across Cultures

Cultural Differences in Mixed Emotions: The Role of Dialectical Thinking

The Hybrid Discrete–dimensional Frame Method for Emotional Film Selection

The Dorsal Anterior Cingulate Cortex Modulates Dialectical Self-Thinking.

Emotional Expression and Ambivalence over Emotional Expression in Martial Relationship

What Is Dialectical Thinking? Conceptualization and Measurement

The Effects of Emotion in E-Negotiation

Dialectical Thinking Is Linked With Smaller Left Nucleus Accumbens and Right Amygdala

Dialectical Versus Linear Thinking Shapes People’s Anticipation of Climate Change

Dialectical Versus Linear Thinking Shapes People's Anticipation of Climate Change

Situational Differences in Dialectical Emotions: Boundary Conditions in A Cultural Comparison of North Americans and East Asians

Do Experiences Studying Abroad Promote Dialectical Thinking? Empirical Evidence From Chinese International Students

Is positive emotion an amplifier or a buffer? It depends: Dialectical thinking moderates the impact of positive emotion on intergroup conflicts.

Dialectical mind can be sweet toward crisis-associated products/brands

The Moderating Role of Dialecticism in Consumer Responses to Product Information

The Yin and Yang of Attitudes and Related Constructs

Trait dialectical thinking is associated with the strength of functional coupling between the dACC and the default mode network

Is it true that negative emotions cause more utilitarian judgements? from the influence of emotion and cognition

Collaboration between East and West: influence of consumer dialectical self on attitude towards co-brand personality traits