AVOaz response of a fractured medium: Laboratory measurements versus numerical simulations

Mohammed Alhussain,Enru Liu,Boris Gurevich,Milovan Urosevic,Shahid Ur Rehman
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1190/1.2792421
2007-01-01
SEG Technical Program Expanded Abstracts
Abstract:PreviousNext No AccessSEG Technical Program Expanded Abstracts 2007AVOaz response of a fractured medium: Laboratory measurements versus numerical simulationsAuthors: Mohammed AlhussainEnru LiuBoris GurevichMilovan UrosevicShahid Ur RehmanMohammed AlhussainCurtin University of TechnologySearch for more papers by this author, Enru LiuBritish Geological Survey (now at ExxonMobil URC)Search for more papers by this author, Boris GurevichCurtin University of TechnologySearch for more papers by this author, Milovan UrosevicCurtin University of TechnologySearch for more papers by this author, and Shahid Ur RehmanCurtin University of TechnologySearch for more papers by this authorhttps://doi.org/10.1190/1.2792421 SectionsAboutPDF/ePub ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationsTrack CitationsPermissions ShareFacebookTwitterLinked InRedditEmail Abstract Azimuthal variation of the AVO response (AVOaz response) of fractured reservoirs is usually modeled using equations for reflection coefficients obtained for plane waves. However, the plane wave approximation can break down at long offsets where incidence angle approaches the critical angle. Since azimuthal variation of AVO response is often more noticeable at large offsets (and can be rather weak), spherical wave effects must be carefully analysed and taken into account. In order to analyse these effects quantitatively we performed an AVOaz laboratory experiment under fully controlled conditions, and then numerically simulated this experiment. The AVOaz response of a physical model is studied in the laboratory with finely layered Plexiglas simulating vertical fractures. Transmission measurements are performed to construct the elasticity tensor for the HTI model. This elasticity tensor is used as an input into numerical simulations which are performed using an anisotropic full‐wave reflectivity algorithm. The comparison of the experimental data with simulations shows a very good match for the isotropic case and good qualitative agreement for the azimuthal variations. The agreement is especially good for critical angles extracted by picking inflection points on AVO curves for at each azimuth. This shows that (1) reflection measurements are consistent with the transmission measurements; (2) the anisotropic numerical simulation algorithm is capable of simulating subtle azimuthal variations with excellent accuracy; (3) the methodology of picking critical angles on seismograms using the inflection point is robust, even in the presence of random and/or systematic noise.Permalink: https://doi.org/10.1190/1.2792421FiguresReferencesRelatedDetailsCited ByFracture clustering effect on amplitude variation with offset and azimuth analysesGEOPHYSICS, Vol. 82, No. 1Azimuthal amplitude variation with offset analysis of physical modeling data acquired over an azimuthally anisotropic mediumFaranak Mahmoudian, Gary F. Margrave, Joe Wong, and David C. Henley31 December 2014 | GEOPHYSICS, Vol. 80, No. 1 SEG Technical Program Expanded Abstracts 2007ISSN (print):1052-3812 ISSN (online):1949-4645Copyright: 2007 Pages: 3124 publication data© 2007 Copyright © 2007 Society of Exploration GeophysicistsPublisher:Society of Exploration Geophysicists HistoryPublished: 14 Sep 2007 CITATION INFORMATION Mohammed Alhussain, Enru Liu, Boris Gurevich, Milovan Urosevic, and Shahid Ur Rehman, (2007), "AVOaz response of a fractured medium: Laboratory measurements versus numerical simulations," SEG Technical Program Expanded Abstracts : 254-258. https://doi.org/10.1190/1.2792421 Plain-Language Summary PDF DownloadLoading ...
What problem does this paper attempt to address?