Abstract:Purpose Catastrophe (CAT) events associated with natural catastrophes and man-made disasters cause profound impacts on the insurance industry. This research thus reviews the impact of CAT risk on the insurance industry and how traditional reinsurance and securitized risk-transfer instruments are used for managing CAT risk. Design/methodology/approach This research reviews the impact of CAT risk on the insurance industry and how traditional reinsurance and securitized risk-transfer instruments are used for managing CAT risk. Apart from many negative influences, CAT events can increase the net revenue of the insurance industry around CAT events and improve insurance demand over the post-CAT periods. The underwriting cycle of reinsurance causes inefficiencies in transferring CAT risks. Securitized risk-transfer instruments resolve some inefficiencies of the reinsurance market, but are subject to moral hazard, basis risk, credit risk, regulatory uncertainty, etc. The authors introduce some popular securitized solutions and use Merton's structural framework to demonstrate how to value these CAT-linked securities. The hybrid solutions by combining reinsurance with securitized CAT instruments are expected to offer promising applications for CAT risk management. Findings The authors introduce some popular securitized solutions and use Merton's structural framework to demonstrate how to value these CAT-linked securities. The hybrid solutions by combining reinsurance with securitized CAT instruments are expected to offer promising applications for CAT risk management. Originality/value This research reviews a broad array of impacts of CAT risks on the (re)insurance industry. CAT events challenge (re)insurance capacity and influence insurers' supply decisions and reconstruction costs in the aftermath of catastrophes. While losses from natural catastrophes are the primary threat to property–casualty insurers, the mortality risk posed by influenza pandemics is a leading CAT risk for life insurers. At the same time, natural catastrophes and man-made disasters cause distinct impacts on (re)insures. Man-made disasters can increase the correlation between insurance stocks and the overall market, and natural catastrophes reduce the above correlation. It should be noted that huge CAT losses can also improve (re)insurance demand during the postevent period and thus bring long-term effects to the (re)insurance industry.

A Review and Prospect of the Decade of Catastrophe Bond Development

An Empirical Study on the Impacts of Catastrophe Bonds on Investment Portfolios at Different Stages

Catastrophe bond market is set for strong growth

Diversification through Catastrophe Bonds: Lessons from the Subprime Financial Crisis

Pricing Model for Earthquake CAT Bonds

Elementary Study on Earthquake Catastrophe Bonds

Catastrophe risk, reinsurance and securitized risk-transfer solutions: a review

Derivatives from Catastrophe Insurance

Seismic Risk In China And A Solution From Cat Bonds

CAT BOND PRICING UNDER A PRODUCT PROBABILITY MEASURE WITH POT RISK CHARACTERIZATION

Pricing Multi-event Triggered Catastrophe Bonds Based on Copula-POT Model

On Catastrophe Insurance Futures and the Market Evolution

Decomposition of Natural Catastrophe Risks: Insurability Using Parametric CAT Bonds

Effect of earthquake sequences on risk‐based catastrophe bond pricing

Data Breach CAT Bonds: Modeling and Pricing

The Valuation of Catastrophe Bonds with Exposure to Currency Exchange Risk

Analysis of Pricing Models of Catastrophe Bonds

On catastrophe insurance options and their evolution

Sidecars:A New Vehicle for Catastrophe Risk Management

Catastrophe Equity Put(CatEPut) and Its Development

Simulating and Pricing CAT Bonds Using the Spectral Method Based on Chebyshev Basis