Abstract:Purpose Catastrophe (CAT) events associated with natural catastrophes and man-made disasters cause profound impacts on the insurance industry. This research thus reviews the impact of CAT risk on the insurance industry and how traditional reinsurance and securitized risk-transfer instruments are used for managing CAT risk. Design/methodology/approach This research reviews the impact of CAT risk on the insurance industry and how traditional reinsurance and securitized risk-transfer instruments are used for managing CAT risk. Apart from many negative influences, CAT events can increase the net revenue of the insurance industry around CAT events and improve insurance demand over the post-CAT periods. The underwriting cycle of reinsurance causes inefficiencies in transferring CAT risks. Securitized risk-transfer instruments resolve some inefficiencies of the reinsurance market, but are subject to moral hazard, basis risk, credit risk, regulatory uncertainty, etc. The authors introduce some popular securitized solutions and use Merton's structural framework to demonstrate how to value these CAT-linked securities. The hybrid solutions by combining reinsurance with securitized CAT instruments are expected to offer promising applications for CAT risk management. Findings The authors introduce some popular securitized solutions and use Merton's structural framework to demonstrate how to value these CAT-linked securities. The hybrid solutions by combining reinsurance with securitized CAT instruments are expected to offer promising applications for CAT risk management. Originality/value This research reviews a broad array of impacts of CAT risks on the (re)insurance industry. CAT events challenge (re)insurance capacity and influence insurers' supply decisions and reconstruction costs in the aftermath of catastrophes. While losses from natural catastrophes are the primary threat to property–casualty insurers, the mortality risk posed by influenza pandemics is a leading CAT risk for life insurers. At the same time, natural catastrophes and man-made disasters cause distinct impacts on (re)insures. Man-made disasters can increase the correlation between insurance stocks and the overall market, and natural catastrophes reduce the above correlation. It should be noted that huge CAT losses can also improve (re)insurance demand during the postevent period and thus bring long-term effects to the (re)insurance industry.

Catastrophe bond market is set for strong growth

Diversification through Catastrophe Bonds: Lessons from the Subprime Financial Crisis

Effect of earthquake sequences on risk‐based catastrophe bond pricing

A Review and Prospect of the Decade of Catastrophe Bond Development

Catastrophe risk, reinsurance and securitized risk-transfer solutions: a review

Decomposition of Natural Catastrophe Risks: Insurability Using Parametric CAT Bonds

CAT BOND PRICING UNDER A PRODUCT PROBABILITY MEASURE WITH POT RISK CHARACTERIZATION

Pricing risk-based catastrophe bonds for earthquakes at an urban scale

Pricing Multi-event Triggered Catastrophe Bonds Based on Copula-POT Model

Mitigating wildfire losses via insurance‐linked securities: Modeling and risk management perspectives

Loading Pricing of Catastrophe Bonds and Other Long-Dated, Insurance-Type Contracts

When is a CAT Index Futures Traded and Preferred to Reinsurance? – Tradeoff Between Basis Risk and Adverse Selection –

The Valuation of Contingent Capital with Catastrophe Risks

The Valuation of Catastrophe Bonds with Exposure to Currency Exchange Risk

Simulating and Pricing CAT Bonds Using the Spectral Method Based on Chebyshev Basis

A Unified Bayesian Framework for Pricing Catastrophe Bond Derivatives

Providing pandemic business interruption coverage with double trigger cat bonds

Pricing of insurance-linked securities: a multi-peril approach

Reinsurance for Catastrophes and Cataclysms

Contemporary trends on global corporate ESG bond market

On Catastrophe Insurance Futures and the Market Evolution