Abstract:Purpose Catastrophe (CAT) events associated with natural catastrophes and man-made disasters cause profound impacts on the insurance industry. This research thus reviews the impact of CAT risk on the insurance industry and how traditional reinsurance and securitized risk-transfer instruments are used for managing CAT risk. Design/methodology/approach This research reviews the impact of CAT risk on the insurance industry and how traditional reinsurance and securitized risk-transfer instruments are used for managing CAT risk. Apart from many negative influences, CAT events can increase the net revenue of the insurance industry around CAT events and improve insurance demand over the post-CAT periods. The underwriting cycle of reinsurance causes inefficiencies in transferring CAT risks. Securitized risk-transfer instruments resolve some inefficiencies of the reinsurance market, but are subject to moral hazard, basis risk, credit risk, regulatory uncertainty, etc. The authors introduce some popular securitized solutions and use Merton's structural framework to demonstrate how to value these CAT-linked securities. The hybrid solutions by combining reinsurance with securitized CAT instruments are expected to offer promising applications for CAT risk management. Findings The authors introduce some popular securitized solutions and use Merton's structural framework to demonstrate how to value these CAT-linked securities. The hybrid solutions by combining reinsurance with securitized CAT instruments are expected to offer promising applications for CAT risk management. Originality/value This research reviews a broad array of impacts of CAT risks on the (re)insurance industry. CAT events challenge (re)insurance capacity and influence insurers' supply decisions and reconstruction costs in the aftermath of catastrophes. While losses from natural catastrophes are the primary threat to property–casualty insurers, the mortality risk posed by influenza pandemics is a leading CAT risk for life insurers. At the same time, natural catastrophes and man-made disasters cause distinct impacts on (re)insures. Man-made disasters can increase the correlation between insurance stocks and the overall market, and natural catastrophes reduce the above correlation. It should be noted that huge CAT losses can also improve (re)insurance demand during the postevent period and thus bring long-term effects to the (re)insurance industry.

Catastrophe Equity Put(CatEPut) and Its Development

The Valuation of Contingent Capital with Catastrophe Risks

On catastrophe insurance options and their evolution

The Empirical Study of VaR-Based Contingent Portfolio Insurance Strategy

On Catastrophe Insurance Futures and the Market Evolution

Loading Pricing of Catastrophe Bonds and Other Long-Dated, Insurance-Type Contracts

A Review and Prospect of the Decade of Catastrophe Bond Development

CAT BOND PRICING UNDER A PRODUCT PROBABILITY MEASURE WITH POT RISK CHARACTERIZATION

Pricing Multi-event Triggered Catastrophe Bonds Based on Copula-POT Model

Analysis of Actuarial Pricing for Catastrophe Insurance Options

Pricing the property claim service (PCS) catastrophe insurance options using gamma distribution

Contemplation on the Establishment of Catastrophe Insurance Fund in China

A Unified Bayesian Framework for Pricing Catastrophe Bond Derivatives

Analysis of Pricing Models of Catastrophe Bonds

Catastrophe risk, reinsurance and securitized risk-transfer solutions: a review

Public-private Partnership for Catastrophic Risk Challenges:International Experiences and Lessons

When is a CAT Index Futures Traded and Preferred to Reinsurance? – Tradeoff Between Basis Risk and Adverse Selection –

On Catastrophe Swaps and Their Developments

The Valuation of Catastrophe Bonds with Exposure to Currency Exchange Risk

Pricing and Hedging Strategies for Cross-Currency Equity Protection Swaps

Catastrophe insurance and flexible planning for supply chain disruption management: a stochastic simulation case study