Abstract:This paper studies the impact of an increase in local leader accountability within an authoritarian regime by examining the e¤ect of the introduction of village level elections in rural China. We collect a unique nationwide survey on the history of electoral reforms in 217 rural Chinese villages (1980-2005) and exploit variation in the timing of the introduction of elections to establish the causal e¤ect of an increase in leadership accountability. We document that the elections were imperfectly implemented, but still decreased the enforcement of unpopular upper government policies and increased appropriate public goods provision at the village level. The ndings provide strong evidence for theories of the benets of increased political accountability. (Keywords: Electoral Accountability, Institutions, Development) We thank Daron Acemoglu, Abhijit Banerjee, Pedro Dal Bó, Esther Duo, Andrew Foster, Dilip Mookherjee, Rohini Pande, Ben Olken, Elizabeth Perry, Scott Rozelle, and Lily Tsai for their insights; the participants of the conference on Endogenous Institutions and Conict at UC Berkeley, the China Summer Institute, NBER China, Ohio State University Agricultural Economics Seminar, Brown Macro Lunch and MIT Development Lunch for useful comments; Ang Sun, Jing Tao, Yiqing Xu, Xiaoxue Zhao and Ben Zou for excellent research assistance; and Je¤ Blossom and Giovanni Zambotti at the Harvard CGA for GIS assistance. We acknowledge the PSTC at Brown and Stanford GSB for nancial support. We are extremely grateful to the Chinese Ministry of Agriculture RCRE for sharing their data, and especially to Zhigang Wu and the team in Gansu Province. We also thank John Giles for sharing his extensive knowledge and documentation of the RCRE NFS dataset with us and Scott Rozelle for his intellectual generosity. We acknowledge nancial support from Brown University PSTC, Stanford Graduate School of Business, Harvard Academy Scholars Research Grant and the National Science Foundation Grant 079643. yMIT: mmb@mit.edu zLSE, NBER, BREAD: g.padro@lse.ack.uk xYale University, NBER, BREAD, CEPR: nancy.qian@yale.edu {CCER at PKU: yyao@pku.edu.cn

The Accountability Perspective in Democratic Systems:a Basic Model

Review on Theories of Accountability

Political Risks and Decentralization:The Comparison of Three Models on Chinese Governance

From Manipulation to Integration: the Strategic Transformation of Grassroots Control in China

Designing Accountable Systems

Accountability and Motivation

Accountability,Leading Behavior and Organizational Performance:An Exploratory Research Based on Township Government in A Western City of China

DOES PUBLIC ACCOUNTABILITY WORK? AN ASSESSMENT TOOL

An Analysis of the Legitimacy of the Democratic Assessment Mechanism

The Accountability Holders in Local Government Performance Evaluation:an Analysis and Ttrends Forecast

Democratic Participation in Daily Work

On the Meaning and Basis of Administrative Accountability

Nonprofit Accountability:A Public Choice Perspective

Propaganda, Alternative Media, and Accountability in Fragile Democracies

Market Effect and Contest-mobility Function of Democratic Selection Mechanism

How and When Democratic Values Matter: Challenging the Effectiveness-Centric Framework in Program Evaluation

On Political Competition in Conventional and Modern Societies

Accountability in an Authoritarian Regime: The Impact of Local Electoral Reforms in Rural China (Preliminary and Incomplete-Do not cite or quote without the permission of the authors)

A Framework for Assessing Accountability in Collaborative Governance: A Process-Based Approach

Expressing Accountability Patterns using Structural Causal Models

Competition Model and the Change of Local Governments’ Behavior—and Governance of China’s Local Government Debt