Abstract:The stability and effectiveness of supranational organizations, like the European Union (EU), will improve when citizens perceive them as legitimate. Across three studies, two of which were preregistered, and a preregistered pilot study, we combined EU legal expertise with social psychological theory on morality to understand how perceived EU legitimacy is influenced by a sense of moral alignment with the EU. We propose that, currently, the EU gives more weight to values linked to "individualizing" moral foundations (e.g. compassion, social justice, and equality) than to values linked to "binding" moral foundations (e.g. patriotism, religion, and traditionalism). As this may leave people who endorse binding moral foundations feel unrepresented, we investigated whether the EU could gain legitimacy by appealing to values that resonate with binding moral foundations. In study 1, text analyses revealed that the European Commission President's State of the Union speeches indeed appeal more to individualizing than to binding moral foundations. Study 2 (n = 595) provided correlational evidence that the negative relationship between binding moral foundations and perceived EU legitimacy was mediated by lower moral alignment with EU law. Finally, study 3 (n = 567) showed through an experiment that reframing or rebalancing EU law to better align it with binding moral foundations could increase perceived EU legitimacy among people who endorse these moral foundations. The results illustrate the importance of understanding and attending to moral diversity among EU citizens. More generally, our work shows how a collaboration between social psychology and law contributes to safeguarding the legitimacy of supranational organizations.

EU's Enlargements and Its Legitimacy:Intergovernmental and Supranational Perspectives

Mapping the moral foundations of the European Union: Why a lack of moral diversity may undermine perceived EU legitimacy

Political legitimacy and European monetary union: contracts, constitutionalism and the normative logic of two-level games

What do citizens want? And why does it matter? Discourses among citizens as opportunities and constraints for EU enlargement

THEORIZING THE EUROPEAN UNION: International Organization, Domestic Polity, or Experiment in New Governance?

EU Responses to the Democratic Deficit and the Rule of Law Crisis: Is It Time for a (New) European Exceptionalism?

Introduction to the special issue: Justice and solidarity in Europe

External democracy promotion in times of internal rule-of-law crisis: the EU and its neighbourhood

Artificial intelligence for political decision-making in the European Union: Effects on citizens’ perceptions of input, throughput, and output legitimacy

The European Union and Interregionalism:Regional Effects and Global Influences

The common sense of European integration

Artificial Intelligence for EU Decision-Making. Effects on Citizens Perceptions of Input, Throughput and Output Legitimacy

"Normative Power Europe" and EU's Diplomacy to China

Reinforcing Institutional Power: The Discourse of Normalcy in European Union Governance

The legitimation of the European Union in the news media: three treaty reform debates

Elite Communication and the Popular Legitimacy of International Organizations

Normative transformations in the European Union: on hardening and softening law

Transnational constitutionalism – conflicts‐law constitutionalism – economic constitutionalism: the exemplary case of the European Union

The legitimacy crisis of investor-state arbitration and the new EU investment court system

Concentric circles of flexible ‘EUropean’ integration: A typology of EU external governance relations

Whither the withering democratic deficit? The impact of the Lisbon Treaty on the Area of Freedom, Security and Justice