Quality of Adverse Drug Reaction Reports Submitted by Health Care Professionals in Xi'an

LIU Jun,YANG Shimin,FENG Bianling,ZHAO Jun,LIU Hua,HUANG Haiyan
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1004-2407.2012.03.029
2012-01-01
Abstract:Objective To evaluate the quality of adverse drug reaction(ADR) reports submitted by health care professionals in Xi′an from January 2008 to December 2010.Methods documentation grade of the ADR reports,the missing essential information elements in reports,the seriousness of the ADRs reported,and the time taken to report an ADR were analyzed and compared between physicians,pharmacists and nurses.Results According to The Specification Ranking Standard of ADR/ADE issued by the SFDA,significantly lower proportion of reports from nurses was received in documentation grade 3 or 4 than that from physicians and pharmacists.There were still some missies of essential information elements in the reports,such as medical records(miss rate=30.55%),contact number(23.55%),brand name(8.19%).The proportion of new and serious ADR in the reports of pharmacists was significantly higher than that of physicians and nurses.Pharmacist reporters took a significantly longer time than physicians and nurses to report their reactions.Conclusion quality of ADR reports submitted by health care professionals is diverse due to the professional backgrounds.Positive measures should be adopted to improve the efficiency of ADR reporting.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?