Abstract:Abstract Principles form part and parcel of our law and legal discourse, so much so that we seldom think of what they are and what they entail. For centuries they have been invoked daily to interpret and argue about the law. But when it comes to matters of constitutional law, principles are further called upon to perform a perennially controversial function: to help police the boundaries of state action. In most common law jurisdictions with a written constitution, this function of principles runs against the generally accepted view that the exercise of judicial review must ultimately be governed and restricted by the terms of the national constitution. This Article argues that the exercise of judicial review based on principles is not confined to that view, once the relationship between principles and the constitution is unpacked and recontextualized. While the English-language literature on principles over the past half-century has been dominated by a select group of Anglo-American scholars, there is a wealth of untapped insights from other parts of the world. One of the major contributions by continental legal theorists even predates the earliest modern Anglo-American writings on the subject by more than a decade. Overall, the law literature in common law and civil law systems reveals a significant degree of commonalities in the basic characters of principles despite the absence of initial evidence of transsystemic borrowings. The wider conceptual inquiry also displays a shift in the focus of the debate, from the protracted search for a clear-cut distinction between rules and principles towards a redefinition of principles’ relationship with “written” law, be it in the form of a civil code or a constitutional instrument. From this inquiry reemerge “unwritten” principles not deriving from codified or legislated law although they have been used to develop the law. Translated into the constitutional domain, these unwritten principles bear no logical connection with the terms of the constitution. Their main functions cover the entire spectrum from serving as interpretive aids to making law by filling gaps. The theoretical framework fits with an ongoing four-century-old narrative of the evolution of constitutional principles and judicial review across most common law-based systems. Constitutional principles are another area where Anglo-American law and legal discourse is less exceptional and more universal than what many assume. Throughout modern Western history, legal battles have been fought and ensuing developments have been made on the grounds of principles. Our law and jurisprudence remain based on them.

Basic Principles of International Economic and Administrative Laws:Equal Protection and Due Process of Law

On the Basic Principles in Civil Laws and Their Relations

The analysis on economic administrative law

The Law of International Human Rights Protection

Administrative Litigation over International Trade Disputes in the Context of Mix of Laws

The Analysis Of the Importance of the Affirming of the Principle of Equal Protection by"Property Law"

Chinese Constitutionality in Globalization Era

General Principles of Commercial Law: Exceed the Unification and Division of Civil Law and Commercial Law

On Form Natural Justice to Due Process——The Transplantation of Legal Thoughts on the Legistation of Administrative

Heavenly Principles? the Translation of International Law in 19Th-Century China and the Constitution of Universality

On Administrative Litigation Of International Trade From Multiple Perspectives

On the Review Standard of Administrative Litigation in International Trade

On the Legislative Expressions of Basic Principles in Civil Law

Legal Principles, Constitutional Principles, and Judicial Review

On the "International Law-Based International Order"

On Economic Analysis of International Law

'Fair and Equitable Treatment' in International Investment Law

Preliminary Study on Public Property Legislation in China

Problems in the Legislation of the AdministrativeProcedure in China

On the Basic Principles of the Social Insurance Law

Balance and Imbalance in Human Rights Law