EXECUTIVE STOCK OPTIONS: A FIRM VALUE APPROACH
PHELIM BOYLE,WEIDONG TIAN
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1142/s0219868105000422
2005-01-01
Journal of Derivatives Accounting
Abstract:Journal of Derivatives AccountingVol. 02, No. 02, pp. 189-201 (2005) ARTICLESNo AccessEXECUTIVE STOCK OPTIONS: A FIRM VALUE APPROACHPHELIM BOYLE and WEIDONG TIANPHELIM BOYLECenter for Advanced Studies in Finance, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Ontario N2L 2Gl, Canada and WEIDONG TIANDeparment of Statistics and Actuarial Science, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Ontario N2L 2Gl, Canadahttps://doi.org/10.1142/S0219868105000422Cited by:0 PreviousNext AboutSectionsPDF/EPUB ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationsTrack CitationsRecommend to Library ShareShare onFacebookTwitterLinked InRedditEmail AbstractExecutive stock options are an important component of executive compensation and the topic is of interest to both practitioners and academics. The vigorous debate on whether these options should be treated as an expense is subsiding but discussion continues on how these instruments should be valued in order to expense them. In this paper, executive stock options are viewed as contingent claims on a firm's assets and we formalize this through the concept of an augmented balance sheet. This means that the total market value of the firm's assets is equal to the market value of its traded securities plus the market value of its stock options. This approach leads to two valuation formulae for these options: one in terms of the firm's stock price and the other in terms of firm value. We explore the connections between these two approaches and derive explicit valuation formulae under certain assumptions.Keywords:Valuationexecutive stock optionsdilution References D. Aboody, Journal of Accounting and Economics 22, 357 (1996). Crossref, Google ScholarL. A. Bebchuk and J. M. Fried, Journal of Economic Perspectives 17(3), 71 (2003). Crossref, Google ScholarL. A. Bebchuk, J. M. Fried and D. I. Walker, University of Chicago Law Review 69(3), 751 (2002). Crossref, Google ScholarY. Bergman, B. Grundy and Z. Wiener, Journal of Finance 51(5), 1573 (1996). Crossref, Google ScholarJ. C. Bettis, J. M. Bizjak and M. L. Lemmon, Journal of Financial Economics 76(2), 445 (2005). Crossref, Google ScholarF. Black and M. Scholes, Journal of Political Economy 81(3), 637 (1973). Crossref, Google ScholarC. Botosan and M. Plumlee, Accounting Horizons 14(4), 311 (2001). Google ScholarM. R. Brenner, R. Sundaram and D. Yermack, Journal of Financial Economics 57(1), 103 (2000). Crossref, Google ScholarM. Broadie and J. B. Detemple, Review of Financial Studies 8(1), 161 (1995). Crossref, Google ScholarZ. Bodie, R. Kaplan and R. Merton, Harvard Business Review 81, (2003). Google Scholar Bodurtha, N. (2002). Dilution and multiple-issue tranches inherent in employee stock options valuation. Working Paper, The McDonough School of Business, Georgetown University . Google ScholarJ. Cai and A. Vijh, Journal of Derivatives (2005). Google ScholarJ. Carpenter, Journal of Financial Economics 48(2), 127 (1998). Crossref, Google ScholarP. Carr and V. Linetsky, European Finance Review 4(3), 211 (2000). Crossref, Google Scholar Chance, D. M. and T. -H. Yang (2004). Expected utility valuation of executive stock options in a binomial framework: a comparative anaylsis. Working Paper, Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge . Google ScholarJ. Core and W. Guay, Journal of Accounting and Economics 28(2), 151 (1999). Crossref, Google ScholarJ. Core and W. Guay, Journal of Financial Economics 61(2), 253 (2001). Crossref, Google Scholar Darsinos, T. and S. E. Satchell (2002). The implied distribution for stocks of companies with warrants and/or executive stock options. Working Paper, Faculty of Economics and Politics, University of Cambridge . Google ScholarH. Demsetz and K. Lehn, Journal of Political Economy 93(6), 1155 (1985). Crossref, Google ScholarJ. Detemple and S. Sundaresan, Review of Financial Studies 12(4), 835 (1999). Crossref, Google ScholarJ. Detemple and W. Tian, Management Science 48(7), 917 (2002). Crossref, Google ScholarP. Dybvig and M. Loewenstein, Review of Financial Studies 16(1), 145 (2003). Crossref, Google ScholarD. Emanuel, Journal of Financial Economics 12(2), 211 (1983). Crossref, Google ScholarJ. Ericsson and J. Reneby, Finance Letters 2, (2004). Google Scholar Financial Accounting Standards (2004). 123(R), Share Based Payment . Google ScholarD. Galai and M. Schneller, Journal of Finance 33(5), 1333 (1978). Crossref, Google Scholar Garvey, G. and T. Milbourn (2001). Do stock prices incorporate the potential dilution of employee stock options? Working Paper, Graduate School of Management, Claremont Graduate University . Google ScholarM. Hanlon, S. Rajgopal and T. Shevlin, Journal of Accounting and Economics 36(1–3), 3 (2003). Crossref, Google ScholarB. Hall and K. Murphy, American Economic Review 90(2), 209 (2000). Crossref, Google ScholarB. Hall and K. Murphy, Journal of Economic Perspectives 17(3), 49 (2003). Crossref, Google ScholarC. Himmelberg, G. Hubbard and D. Palia, Journal of Financial Economics 53(3), 353 (1999). Crossref, Google ScholarJ. Hull and A. White, Financial Analysts Journal 60(1), 114 (2002). Crossref, Google ScholarJ. Hull and A. White, Journal of Derivative Accounting 1(1), 3 (2004). Link, Google ScholarS. Huddart, Journal of Accounting and Economics 18(2), 207 (1994). Crossref, Google Scholar International Accounting Standards (2004). IFRS 2, Share-Based Payment . Google Scholar Johnson, S., H. Ryan and Y. Tian (2003). Executive compensation and corporate fraud. Working paper, Louisiana State University . Google ScholarH. Leland, Journal of Finance 49(4), 1213 (1994). Crossref, Google ScholarA. Marcus and M. Kulatilaka, Financial Analysts Journal 50(5), 46 (1994). Google ScholarR. C. Merton, Journal of Finance 29(2), 449 (1974). Google ScholarS. Rajgopal and T. Shevlin, Journal of Accounting and Economics 33(2), 145 (2002). Crossref, Google ScholarM. Rubinstein, Journal of Derivatives 3, 8 (1995). Crossref, Google ScholarJ. Sidenius, Financial Analysts Journal 52(5), 77 (1996). Crossref, Google ScholarD. Yermack, Journal of Finance 52(2), 449 (1997). Crossref, Google Scholar FiguresReferencesRelatedDetails Recommended Vol. 02, No. 02 Metrics History KeywordsValuationexecutive stock optionsdilutionPDF download
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
-
Stock options for undiversified executives
Brian J. Hall,Kevin J. Murphy
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/s0165-4101(01)00050-7
IF: 7.293
2002-02-01
Journal of Accounting and Economics
Abstract:We employ a certainty-equivalence framework to analyze the cost, value and pay/performance sensitivity of non-tradable options held by undiversified, risk-averse executives. We derive “executive value” lines, the risk-adjusted analogues to Black–Scholes lines. We show that distinguishing between “executive value” and “company cost” provides insight into many issues regarding stock option practice including: executive views about Black–Scholes values; tradeoffs between options, restricted stock and cash; exercise price policies; option repricings; early exercise policies and decisions; and the length of vesting periods. It also leads to reinterpretations of both cross-sectional facts and longitudinal trends in the level of executive compensation.
business, finance,economics
-
Stock and Option Proportions in Executive Compensation
Phelim P. Boyle,Ranjini Jha,Shannon Kennedy,Weidong Tian
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1142/s2010139211000055
2011-03-01
Quarterly Journal of Finance
Abstract:There is controversy about the relative merits of stock and options in executive compensation. Some observers contend that stock is a more efficient mechanism, while others reach the opposite conclusion. We focus on the manager's risk-taking incentives and derive an optimal compensation contract by using the concept of a comparable benchmark and imposing a volatility constraint in a principal-agent framework. We demonstrate a joint role for both stock and options in the optimal contract. We show that firms with higher volatility should use more options in compensating their executives and provide empirical evidence supporting this testable implication.
-
The exercise and valuation of executive stock options
Jennifer N. Carpenter
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/s0304-405x(98)00006-3
IF: 8.9
1998-05-01
Journal of Financial Economics
Abstract:In theory, hedging restrictions faced by managers make executive stock options more difficult to value than ordinary options, because they imply that exercise policies of managers depend on their preferences and endowments. Using data on option exercises from 40 firms, this paper shows that a simple extension of the ordinary American option model which introduces random, exogenous exercise and forfeiture predicts actual exercise times and payoffs just as well as an elaborate utility-maximizing model that explicitly accounts for the nontransferability of options. The simpler model could therefore be more useful than the preference-based model for valuing executive options in practice.
economics,business, finance
-
A Top-Down Approach for the Multiple Exercises and Valuation of Employee Stock Options
Tim Leung,Yang Zhou
DOI: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1906.03562
2019-09-16
Abstract:We propose a new framework to value employee stock options (ESOs) that captures multiple exercises of different quantities over time. We also model the ESO holder's job termination risk and incorporate its impact on the payoffs of both vested and unvested ESOs. Numerical methods based on Fourier transform and finite differences are developed and implemented to solve the associated systems of PDEs. In addition, we introduce a new valuation method based on maturity randomization that yields analytic formulae for vested and unvested ESO costs. We examine the cost impact of job termination risk, exercise intensity, and various contractual features.
Pricing of Securities
-
Why Do Employees Like to Be Paid with Options?: A Multi-Period Prospect Theory Approach
Lei Sun,Martin Widdicks
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2016.03.002
IF: 6.1
2016-01-01
Journal of Corporate Finance
Abstract:The use of options as compensation for non-executive employees is a puzzle. Standard, rational, valuation models show that the cost of issuing options is larger than the value placed on the options by employees. Existing explanations for this puzzle are based upon static models that ignore the considerable dynamic aspects of employee stock option pricing and exercise behavior. We develop dynamic, multiperiod models of employee preferences considering risk aversion, loss aversion, overconfidence and probability weighting to test possible explanations of the use of employee stock options. We find that a cumulative prospect theory model generates scenarios where employees would prefer options to either cash or equity payments, and also optimally exercise their options early. This is the only model where options are preferred and also optimally exercised early.
-
Real options: valuing flexibility in strategic mergers and acquisitions as an exchange ratio swap
Hemantha S.B. Herath,John S. Jahera
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/03074350210768202
2002-12-01
Managerial Finance
Abstract:In recent years, practitioners and academics have argued that traditional discounted cash flow (DCF) valuation models do not adequately capture the value of managerial flexibility to delay, grow, scale down or abandon projects. The insight is that a business investment opportunity can be conceptually compared to a financial option. The purpose of this paper is to develop a theoretical model based on option pricing theory to value managerial flexibility arising in stock for stock exchanges. The paper shows how a mergers and acquisition (M&A) deal may be optimally structured as a real options swap by including managerial flexibility of both the acquiring and target firms when stock prices are volatile. Using a recent acquisition case example from US banking industry the paper illustrates how the proposed exchange ratio swap optimize deal value and avoids earnings per share (EPS) dilution to both parties. Appropriate valuation of managerial flexibility is important given the historical premiums paid in takeovers. While the fact that such premiums exist lends some credibility to the idea that at least implicitly managerial flexibility is valued, the real options approach allows for more explicit valuation of such flexibility.
-
Should Executive Stock Options Be Abandoned?
Chongwoo Choe,Xiangkang Yin
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/031289620603100201
2006-12-01
Australian Journal of Management
Abstract:Recent corporate scandals around the world have led many to single out executive stock options as one of the main culprits. More corporations are abandoning stock options and reverting to restricted stock. This paper argues that such a change is not entirely justifiable. We first provide a critical review of the pros and cons of executive stock options. We then compare option-based contracts with stock-based contracts using a simple principal-agent model with moral hazard. In a general environment without restrictions on preferences or technologies, option-based contracts are shown to weakly dominate stock-based contracts. The weak dominance relation becomes strict if the manager is risk neutral. Numerical examples are provided to show that, even if the manager is risk averse, strict dominance is more likely the case.
-
Nonlinearity, correlation and the valuation of employee stock options
M. R. Grasselli
DOI: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.math/0511234
2005-11-10
Abstract:We propose a discrete time algorithm for the valuation of employee stock options based on exponential indifference prices and taking into account both the possibility of partial exercise of a fraction of the options and the use of a correlated traded asset to hedge part of their risk. We determine the optimal exercise policy under this conditions and present numerical results showing how both effects can significantly change the value of the option for an employee, as well as its cost for the issuing firm.
Statistics Theory,Probability,Statistical Finance
-
Do Underwater Executive Stock Options Still Align Incentives? the Effect of Stock Price Movements on Managerial Incentive-Alignment
Li Jin,Lisa K. Meulbroek
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.291571
2001-01-01
Abstract:The concern that out-of-the-money stock options are not an effective way to motivate managers has led boards of directors to consider measures such as lowering the exercise price of underwater options, or issuing new option grants, to restore the incentive managers have to increase shareholder value. This paper explores whether such measures are needed: do out-of-the-money options lose their power to align incentives? We address this question by estimating how the incentive-alignment power of options changed over the course of the year 2000, a year that for many firms marked the derailment of the long-running bull stock market. Examining the sensitivity in the value of the manager's stock option to changes in the firm's stock price (one metric for incentive-alignment power), we find that in general the ability of options to align incentives remained remarkably intact. This resilience in incentive-alignment power stems from the long maturity of executive stock options, the relatively high stock price volatility of firms that experienced stock price declines, and to a lesser extent, the increase in volatility levels that accompanied weakening stock prices. We test the robustness of these results to the metric of incentive-alignment power, replacing market values with the value that managers place on their stock and option holdings, adjusting for managers' inability to fully diversify their portfolios. We also test how sensitive our results are to volatility assumptions. We conclude that even a steep decline in stock price can leave incentive levels intact, so restoring incentive-alignment is seldom a good justification for resetting the stock price or issuing new option grants. Before rejecting such measures, however, boards must examine whether the ability of stock and option holdings to retain key managerial talent deteriorated as the stock price declined, for our findings suggest that in selected firms or industries, the value of those holdings declined substantially.
-
Do Stock Options Overcome Managerial Risk Aversion? Evidence from Exercises of Executive Stock Options
Randall A. Heron,Erik Lie
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2016.2485
IF: 5.4
2017-09-01
Management Science
Abstract:We report that the probability that executives exercise options early decreases with the volatility of the underlying stock return. We interpret this to mean that executives’ subjective option value increases with volatility and that option grants increase executives’ risk appetite. Further decomposition reveals that the results are most pronounced for idiosyncratic volatility, consistent with our conjecture that executives believe they can better predict or influence the resolution of idiosyncratic uncertainty than systematic uncertainty and, thus, favor the former. Data are available at http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2016.2495 . This paper was accepted by Wei Jiang, finance.
management,operations research & management science
-
The Preliminary Research Of Stock Option Incentive And Good Power Price To Senior Executives Of The Listed Companies In China
Hao Zhou
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-38427-1_65
2013-01-01
Abstract:At present, the high development of Knowledge economy is promoting industries of our country unceasingly, and knowledge plays more and more a vital role in the economic development process. Too relied on the capital the industry originally, because of high energy consumption and high pollution, many companies do not meet the needs of the low-carbon economy to eliminate now; or carrying on the industrial upgrading to enhance the technique of production and the product technique content, increased to the knowledge and the technical request. The stock option incentive involves the question of price formulation. Many foreign scholars have proposed some models to study question, and we can attain profits from the significance but too complex. This article also studies the question of the stock option price. According to the HU theory, this article establishes a mathematics price model, causing the stimulators of the driving plan to be possible to participate fully. And simultaneously it avoids the inappropriate arbitrage behaviors. This article has also carried on mathematics proof to this model, confirming its superiority.
-
Options as Silver Bullets: Valuation of Term Loans, Inventory Management, Emissions Trading and Insurance Risk Mitigation using Option Theory
Ravi Kashyap
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-022-04610-w
2022-03-27
Abstract:Models to price long term loans in the securities lending business are developed. These longer horizon deals can be viewed as contracts with optionality embedded in them. This insight leads to the usage of established methods from derivatives theory to price such contracts. Numerical simulations are used to demonstrate the practical applicability of these models. The techniques advanced here can lead to greater synergies between the management of derivative and delta-one trading desks, perhaps even being able to combine certain aspects of the day to day operations of these seemingly disparate entities. These models are part of one of the least explored, yet profit laden, areas of modern investment management.
A heuristic is developed to mitigate any loss of information, which might set in when parameters are estimated first and then the valuations are performed, by directly calculating valuations using the historical time series. This approach to valuations can lead to reduced models errors, robust estimation systems, greater financial stability and economic strength. An illustration is provided regarding how the methodologies developed here could be useful for inventory management, emissions trading and insurance risk mitigation. All these techniques could have applications for dealing with other financial instruments, non-financial commodities and many forms of uncertainty.
Pricing of Securities,General Economics,Portfolio Management,Trading and Market Microstructure
-
Estimating the Cost of Executive Stock Options: evidence from Switzerland
Wolfgang Drobetz,Pascal Pensa,Markus M. Schmid
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8683.2007.00612.x
2007-09-01
Abstract:It is often argued that Black‐Scholes (1973 ) values overstate the subjective value of stock options granted to risk‐averse and under‐diversified executives. We construct a “representative” Swiss executive and extend the certainty‐equivalence approach presented by Hall and Murphy (2002 ) to assess the value‐cost wedge of executive stock options. Even with low coefficients of relative risk aversion, the discount can be above 50 per cent compared to the Black‐Scholes values. Regression analysis reveals that the equilibrium level of executive compensation is explained by economic determinant variables such as firm size and growth opportunities, whereas the pay‐for‐performance sensitivity remains largely unexplained. Firms with larger boards of directors pay higher wages, indicating potentially unresolved agency conflicts. We reject the hypothesis that cross‐sectional differences in the amount of executive pay vanish when risk‐adjusted values are used as the dependent variable.
-
Executive stock options: volatility, managerial decisions and agency costs
David Brookfield,Phillip Ormrod
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/s1042-444x(00)00024-4
IF: 4.482
2000-12-01
Journal of Multinational Financial Management
Abstract:This paper proposes a new rationale for understanding managerial contracts which set-out to induce stock price volatility in the form of granting of executive stock options. First, we suggest that previous research focuses too much on short term volatility effects and offering neither a theoretical or empirical perspective on incentives which might influence long-term behaviour. To address this, we offer a theoretical structure of why managerial incentives might be important in determining the evolution of volatility over the life of an option contract and provide empirical support for our views. Second, we examine the impact of option moneyness on managerial behaviour over time and provide an analysis, with supporting empirical work, of the unintended incentives thereby created. Our approach suggests that volatility-inducing contracts do not work in the intended manner and supports a growing body of work which indicates that option-based remuneration does not incentivise managers to enhance corporate performance. Our evidence is within a UK context, based on a near-population sample size.
business, finance
-
ESO Valuation with Job Termination Risk and Jumps in Stock Price
Tim Leung,Haohua Wan
DOI: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1504.08073
2015-04-30
Pricing of Securities
Abstract:Employee stock options (ESOs) are American-style call options that can be terminated early due to employment shock. This paper studies an ESO valuation framework that accounts for job termination risk and jumps in the company stock price. Under general L\'evy stock price dynamics, we show that a higher job termination risk induces the ESO holder to voluntarily accelerate exercise, which in turn reduces the cost to the company. The holder's optimal exercise boundary and ESO cost are determined by solving an inhomogeneous partial integro-differential variational inequality (PIDVI). We apply Fourier transform to simplify the variational inequality and develop accurate numerical methods. Furthermore, when the stock price follows a geometric Brownian motion, we provide closed-form formulas for both the vested and unvested perpetual ESOs. Our model is also applied to evaluate the probabilities of understating ESO expenses and contract termination.
-
Stock option plans for non-executive employees
John E. Core,Wayne R. Guay,J Core
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/s0304-405x(01)00062-9
IF: 8.9
2001-08-01
Journal of Financial Economics
Abstract:We examine determinants of non-executive employee stock option holdings, grants, and exercises for 756 firms during 1994–1997. We find that firms use greater stock option compensation when facing capital requirements and financing constraints. Our results are also consistent with firms using options to attract and retain certain types of employees as well as to create incentives to increase firm value. After controlling for economic determinants and stock returns, option exercises are greater (less) when the firm's stock price hits 52-week highs (lows), which confirms in a broad sample the psychological bias documented by Heath et al. (Quarterly Journal of Economics 114 (1999) 601–628).
economics,business, finance
-
Option implied riskiness and risk-taking incentives of executive compensation
Chia-Chi Lu,Carl Hsin-han Shen,Pai-Ta Shih,Wei‐Che Tsai
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11156-022-01123-2
2022-12-29
Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting
Abstract:The riskiness developed by Aumann and Serrano (J Polit Econ 116:810–836, 2008) is a measure based on mean, standard deviation and higher order moments. Instead of relying on corporate policies as indirect measures of firm risk, we theoretically show a positive relation between the value of compensation contracts with convex payoff and the firm's option implied riskiness through second-order stochastic dominance and provide supportive empirical evidence of this risk taking incentive. To address the endogeneity concern, we perform a difference-in-difference analysis using the implementation of FAS 123R in 2006, an accounting standard under which firms are required to recognize the fair value-based expense of stock option grants. Firms thereby are discouraged from granting executive stock options (ESO) because of the higher cost resulted from the strict expense recognition required by FAS 123R. Hence, the implementation of FAS 123R results in an exogenous negative shock to the use of ESO. Using this approach, we find a significant decrease in the option implied riskiness subsequent to FAS 123R, supportive of the risk-taking incentive associated with executive stock options.
-
The 1990s witnessed an explosion in the use of restricted stock and stock options
Zhiyong Dong,Cong Wang,Fei Xie
2012-01-01
Abstract:We examine whether executive stock options can induce excessive risk taking by managers in firms’ security issue decisions. We find that CEOs whose wealth is more sensitive to stock return volatility due to their option holdings are more likely to choose debt over equity as a capital raising vehicle. More importantly, the pattern holds not only in firms that are underlevered relative to their optimal capital structure but also in overlevered firms. This evidence is inconsistent with executive stock options aligning the interests of managers and shareholders; rather, it supports the hypothesis that stock options sometimes make managers take on too much risk and in the process pursue suboptimal capital structure policies. JEL classification: G30; G32
-
A dynamic analysis of executive stock options: Determinants and consequences
Yenn-Ru Chen,Bong Soo Lee
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2009.10.001
IF: 6.1
2010-02-01
Journal of Corporate Finance
Abstract:We investigate the determinants of executive stock options (ESOs) and their impact on risky investment and subsequent firm performance in a dynamic setting. We find that, first, the dynamic response of ESOs to growth opportunity and risk is positive and lasts for two to three years. Second, the dynamic response of risky investments to option compensation is positive but converges to zero after three years. More importantly, the positive effect of ESOs on risky investments is observed when CEOs' personal risk-aversion is taken into account. Third, accounting performance responds positively to the risky, option-induced investment, but the dynamic effect lasts only for one year. Meanwhile, when managers undertake more risky investments than what ESOs imply, accounting performance responds negatively to the over-investment.
business, finance
-
Option Profit and Loss Attribution and Pricing: A New Framework
Peter Carr,Liuren Wu
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3148796
2018-01-01
SSRN Electronic Journal
Abstract:Marking to market dictates that investors worry not only about terminal payoffs, but also about daily price fluctuations. This paper develops a new valuation framework that links the pricing of an option investment to its daily profit and loss attribution. The new framework uses the explicit Black-Merton-Scholes option pricing formula to attribute the short term investment risk of the option to variations in the underlying security price and in the option's implied volatility. This attribution highlights the key risk drivers affecting the short term investment return distribution and provides a basis for determining what risks to dynamically hedge and what risks to take exposure on. Taking risk-neutral expectation and applying dynamic no-arbitrage constraints results in a pricing relation that links the option's fair implied volatility level to the underlying's short term volatility level as well as corrections for the implied volatility's own expected direction of movement, its variance, and its covariance with the underlying security return. Commonality assumptions on the implied volatility co-movements across strike price, maturity date, and the underlying security allow one to generate cross-sectional pricing implications for a selected number or range of option contracts underlying the same security or across many different names.