Abstract:The concern that out-of-the-money stock options are not an effective way to motivate managers has led boards of directors to consider measures such as lowering the exercise price of underwater options, or issuing new option grants, to restore the incentive managers have to increase shareholder value. This paper explores whether such measures are needed: do out-of-the-money options lose their power to align incentives? We address this question by estimating how the incentive-alignment power of options changed over the course of the year 2000, a year that for many firms marked the derailment of the long-running bull stock market. Examining the sensitivity in the value of the manager's stock option to changes in the firm's stock price (one metric for incentive-alignment power), we find that in general the ability of options to align incentives remained remarkably intact. This resilience in incentive-alignment power stems from the long maturity of executive stock options, the relatively high stock price volatility of firms that experienced stock price declines, and to a lesser extent, the increase in volatility levels that accompanied weakening stock prices. We test the robustness of these results to the metric of incentive-alignment power, replacing market values with the value that managers place on their stock and option holdings, adjusting for managers' inability to fully diversify their portfolios. We also test how sensitive our results are to volatility assumptions. We conclude that even a steep decline in stock price can leave incentive levels intact, so restoring incentive-alignment is seldom a good justification for resetting the stock price or issuing new option grants. Before rejecting such measures, however, boards must examine whether the ability of stock and option holdings to retain key managerial talent deteriorated as the stock price declined, for our findings suggest that in selected firms or industries, the value of those holdings declined substantially.

Executive stock options: volatility, managerial decisions and agency costs

Do Stock Options Overcome Managerial Risk Aversion? Evidence from Exercises of Executive Stock Options

Stock and Option Proportions in Executive Compensation

Why Do Employees Like to Be Paid with Options?: A Multi-Period Prospect Theory Approach

The 1990s witnessed an explosion in the use of restricted stock and stock options

Do Underwater Executive Stock Options Still Align Incentives? the Effect of Stock Price Movements on Managerial Incentive-Alignment

Should Executive Stock Options Be Abandoned?

Stock options for undiversified executives

A dynamic analysis of executive stock options: Determinants and consequences

Option implied riskiness and risk-taking incentives of executive compensation

The exercise and valuation of executive stock options

Backdating Executive Stock Option Grants: An Agency Problem or Just Efficient Contracting?

An Empirical Model for Volatility of Returns and Option Pricing

The interaction between equity-based compensation and debt in managerial risk choices

Managers' Investment Timing Decisions under Endogenous Compensation Contracts

Incentive Contracting under Ambiguity Aversion

Repeated Moral Hazard and Executive Stock Option

Project Selection, Production, Uncertainty, and Incentives

Earnings vs. stock-price based incentives in managerial compensation contracts

Influences of top management team incentives on firm risk taking

Motives of Stock Option Incentive Design, Ownership, and Inefficient Investment